Literature DB >> 16689708

The return on investment in health care: from 1980 to 2000.

Bryan R Luce1, Josephine Mauskopf, Frank A Sloan, Jan Ostermann, L Clark Paramore.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the return on US investment (ROI) in overall health as well as four specific conditions.
METHODS: The study utilized three distinct approaches to "triangulate" the evidence as related to ROI in health care: 1) an estimation of the average ROI in additional health-care service expenditures in the United States for the year 2000 compared with the year 1980, based on US summaries of health expenditures and health outcomes; 2) an estimate of the ROI in Medicare services for the period from 1985 to 2000 for treatment of heart attack, stroke, type 2 diabetes, and breast cancer, based on National Long-term Care Survey data and Medicare claims; and 3) an estimate of the ROI for selected major treatment innovations for the same four conditions during the period from 1975 to 2000.
RESULTS: We calculated that each additional dollar spent on overall health-care services produced health gains valued at Dollars 1.55 to Dollars 1.94 under our base case assumptions. The return on health gains associated with treatment for heart attack, stroke, type 2 diabetes, and breast cancer were Dollars 1.10, Dollars 1.49, Dollars 1.55, and Dollars 4.80, respectively, for every additional dollar spent by Medicare. The ROI for specific treatment innovations ranged from both savings in treatment costs and gains in health to gains in health valued at Dollars 1.12 to Dollars 38.00 for every additional dollar spent.
CONCLUSION: The value of improved health in the US population in 2000 compared with 1980 significantly outweighs the additional health-care expenditures in 2000 compared with 1980.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16689708     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00095.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  19 in total

1.  Does the funding source influence the results in economic evaluations? A case study in bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Rachael L Fleurence; D Eldon Spackman; Christopher Hollenbeak
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  The financial performance of the health care industry: a global, regional and industry specific empirical investigation.

Authors:  Gregor Dorfleitner; Felix Rößle
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2017-06-02

3.  A catalyst for change: the European cancer Patient's Bill of Rights.

Authors:  Mark Lawler; Thierry Le Chevalier; Martin J Murphy; Ian Banks; Pierfranco Conte; Francesco De Lorenzo; Françoise Meunier; H M Pinedo; Peter Selby; Jean-Pierre Armand; Mariano Barbacid; Michèle Barzach; Jonas Bergh; Gerlind Bode; David A Cameron; Filippo de Braud; Aimery de Gramont; Volker Diehl; Sarper Diler; Sema Erdem; John M Fitzpatrick; Jan Geissler; Donal Hollywood; Liselotte Højgaard; Denis Horgan; Jacek Jassem; Peter W Johnson; Peter Kapitein; Joan Kelly; Sandra Kloezen; Carlo La Vecchia; Bob Löwenberg; Kathy Oliver; Richard Sullivan; Josep Tabernero; Cornelis J Van de Velde; Nils Wilking; Roger Wilson; Christoph Zielinski; Harald Zur Hausen; Patrick G Johnston
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-02-03

4.  Returns on Investment in California County Departments of Public Health.

Authors:  Timothy T Brown
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Returns to Local-Area Healthcare Spending: Evidence from Health Shocks to Patients Far From Home.

Authors:  Joseph J Doyle
Journal:  Am Econ J Appl Econ       Date:  2011-07

6.  ESTIMATING MARGINAL RETURNS TO MEDICAL CARE: EVIDENCE FROM AT-RISK NEWBORNS.

Authors:  Douglas Almond; Joseph J Doyle; Amanda E Kowalski; Heidi Williams
Journal:  Q J Econ       Date:  2010-05-01

Review 7.  The cost effectiveness of bisphosphonates for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis: a structured review of the literature.

Authors:  Rachael L Fleurence; Cynthia P Iglesias; Jeanene M Johnson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Comparing the USA, UK and 17 Western countries' efficiency and effectiveness in reducing mortality.

Authors:  Colin Pritchard; Mark S Wallace
Journal:  JRSM Short Rep       Date:  2011-07-20

9.  Evaluation of health research: measuring costs and socioeconomic effects.

Authors:  Kerstin Roback; Koustuv Dalal; Per Carlsson
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2011-10

10.  Societal savings in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer receiving bevacizumab-based versus non-bevacizumab-based treatments in France, Germany, Italy, and Spain.

Authors:  Johanna Lister; Sanja Stanisic; Klaus Kaier; Christian Hagist; Dmitry Gultyaev; Stefan Walzer
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2012-10-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.