Literature DB >> 16689579

Implicit versus explicit solvent in free energy calculations of enzyme catalysis: Methyl transfer catalyzed by catechol O-methyltransferase.

Thomas H Rod1, Patrik Rydberg, Ulf Ryde.   

Abstract

We compare free energy calculations for the methyl transfer reaction catalyzed by catechol O-methyltransferase using the quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical free energy method with implicit and explicit solvents. An analogous methylation reaction in a solution is also studied. For the explicit solvent model, we use the three-point transferable intermolecular potential model, and for the implicit model, we use the generalized Born molecular volume model as implemented in CHARMM. We find that activation and reaction free energies calculated with the two models are very similar, despite some structural differences that exist. A significant change in the polarization of the environment occurs as the reaction proceeds. This is more pronounced for the reaction in a solution than for the enzymatic reaction. For the enzymatic reaction, most of the changes take place in the protein rather than in the solvent, and, hence, the benefit of having an instantaneous relaxation of the solvent degrees of freedom is less pronounced for the enzymatic reaction than for the reaction in a solution. This is a likely reason why energies of the enzyme reaction are less sensitive to the choice of atomic radii than are energies of the reaction in a solution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16689579     DOI: 10.1063/1.2186635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  9 in total

1.  DelPhi Web Server: A comprehensive online suite for electrostatic calculations of biological macromolecules and their complexes.

Authors:  Subhra Sarkar; Shawn Witham; Jie Zhang; Maxim Zhenirovskyy; Walter Rocchia; Emil Alexov
Journal:  Commun Comput Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.246

2.  Ab initio quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical molecular dynamics simulation of enzyme catalysis: the case of histone lysine methyltransferase SET7/9.

Authors:  Shenglong Wang; Po Hu; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Continuous development of schemes for parallel computing of the electrostatics in biological systems: implementation in DelPhi.

Authors:  Chuan Li; Marharyta Petukh; Lin Li; Emil Alexov
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Electronic Absorption Spectra from MM and ab initio QM/MM Molecular Dynamics: Environmental Effects on the Absorption Spectrum of Photoactive Yellow Protein.

Authors:  Christine M Isborn; Andreas W Götz; Matthew A Clark; Ross C Walker; Todd J Martínez
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Use of Interaction Energies in QM/MM Free Energy Simulations.

Authors:  Phillip S Hudson; H Lee Woodcock; Stefan Boresch
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  How Large Should the QM Region Be in QM/MM Calculations? The Case of Catechol O-Methyltransferase.

Authors:  Heather J Kulik; Jianyu Zhang; Judith P Klinman; Todd J Martínez
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Accelerating QM/MM Free Energy Computations via Intramolecular Force Matching.

Authors:  Phillip S Hudson; Stefan Boresch; David M Rogers; H Lee Woodcock
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  DelPhi: a comprehensive suite for DelPhi software and associated resources.

Authors:  Lin Li; Chuan Li; Subhra Sarkar; Jie Zhang; Shawn Witham; Zhe Zhang; Lin Wang; Nicholas Smith; Marharyta Petukh; Emil Alexov
Journal:  BMC Biophys       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 4.778

9.  Cheminformatic quantum mechanical enzyme model design: A catechol-O-methyltransferase case study.

Authors:  Thomas J Summers; Qianyi Cheng; Manuel A Palma; Diem-Trang Pham; Dudley K Kelso; Charles Edwin Webster; Nathan J DeYonker
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.699

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.