Literature DB >> 16689186

The safety of allergen immunotherapy (IT) in Turkey.

A B Dursun1, B A Sin, F Oner, Z Misirligil.   

Abstract

Allergen immunotherapy (IT) has encouraging therapeutic outcomes but its safety is still being questioned because of possible severe systemic reactions. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of systemic reactions (SR), and to identify their correlation with the characteristics of therapy, such as allergen composition and IT schedule, and diagnosis. We analyzed the data of 126 patients who received IT between 2000-2003, and suffered from respiratory allergy or hymenoptera venom anaphylaxis. IT was given by rush, clustered or conventional schedules. The standardized allergen extracts used were grass pollen, house dust mite and hymenoptera venom in 88, 18 and 20 patients, respectively. None of the patients received premedication. A total 4705 injections were administered. One hundred and twenty-three adverse events (AE) (2.6% per injection) were documented in 46 patients. Sixty-one of them were SRs (1.3% SRs per injection) and they were seen in 28 patients. Asthmatics had more tendency to SRs (p=0.05). Rush (1.8%) and clustered (2.8%) IT protocols were associated with a higher rate of SRs (per injection) when compared to conventional schedule (0.9%) (rush vs conventional; p=0.013, clustered vs conventional; p=0.001). The majority of SRs corresponded to grade 3 (49%). Forty-nine (80%) of the 61 SRs were observed during the build-up phase, and mostly with pollen extracts (75.5%). Patients showed more severe SRs during the build-up phase (p<0.05). Twenty-six (42.6%) of the SRs were immediate, whereas 35 (57.4%) SRs appeared within 2 hours. Delayed SRs were significantly more frequent in polysensitized patients when compared to monosensitized subjects (p=0.018). Our data indicate that rapid IT regimens and the presence of asthma represent a greater risk for SR development. Since the late SRs occur as frequently as the early ones, we suggest a longer waiting period beyond 30 minutes, especially in polysensitized and asthmatic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16689186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol        ISSN: 1018-9068            Impact factor:   4.333


  3 in total

Review 1.  Risk associated with bee venom therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeong Hwan Park; Bo Kyung Yim; Jun-Hwan Lee; Sanghun Lee; Tae-Hun Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Evaluation of Sub cutaneousRush Immunotherapy Effectiveness in Perennial Allergic Rhinitis after a Year from Treatment.

Authors:  Mohsen Tizro; Reza Farid Hosseini; Maryam Khoshkhui; Ali Fouladvand; Mojgan Mohammadi; Samane Sistani; Farahzad Jabbari Azad
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-05

3.  Turkish Guideline for Diagnosis and Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis (ART).

Authors:  Mustafa Cenk Ecevit; Müge Özcan; İlknur Haberal Can; Emel Çadallı Tatar; Serdar Özer; Erkan Esen; Doğan Atan; Sercan Göde; Çağdaş Elsürer; Aylin Eryılmaz; Berna Uslu Coşkun; Zahide Mine Yazıcı; Mehmet Emre Dinç; Fatih Özdoğan; Kıvanç Günhan; Nagihan Bilal; Arzu Yasemin Korkut; Fikret Kasapoğlu; Bilge Türk; Ela Araz Server; Özlem Önerci Çelebi; Tuğçe Şimşek; Rauf Oğuzhan Kum; Mustafa Kemal Adalı; Erdem Eren; Nesibe Gül Yüksel Aslıer; Tuba Bayındır; Aslı Çakır Çetin; Ayşe Enise Göker; Işıl Adadan Güvenç; Sabri Köseoğlu; Gül Soylu Özler; Ethem Şahin; Aslı Şahin Yılmaz; Ceren Güne; Gökçe Aksoy Yıldırım; Bülent Öca; Mehmet Durmuşoğlu; Yunus Kantekin; Süay Özmen; Gözde Orhan Kubat; Serap Köybaşı Şanal; Emine Elif Altuntaş; Adin Selçuk; Haşmet Yazıcı; Deniz Baklacı; Atılay Yaylacı; Deniz Hancı; Sedat Doğan; Vural Fidan; Kemal Uygur; Nesil Keleş; Cemal Cingi; Bülent Topuz; Salih Çanakçıoğlu; Metin Önerci
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.