Literature DB >> 16688924

Cost-effectiveness of hospital pay-for-performance incentives.

Tammie A Nahra1, Kristin L Reiter, Richard A Hirth, Janet E Shermer, John R C Wheeler.   

Abstract

One increasingly popular mechanism for stimulating quality improvements is pay-for-performance, or incentive, programs. This article examines the cost-effectiveness of a hospital incentive system for heart-related care, using a principal-agent model, where the insurer is the principal and hospitals are the agents. Four-year incentive system costsfor the payer were dollar 22,059,383, composed primarily of payments to the participating hospitals, with approximately 5 percent in administrative costs. Effectiveness is measured in stages, beginning with improvements in the processes of heart care. Care process improvements are converted into quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, with reference to literatures on clinical effectiveness and survival. An estimated 24,418 patients received improved care, resulting in a range of QALYs from 733 to 1,701, depending on assumptions about clinical effectiveness. Cost per QALY was found to be between dollar 12,967 and dollar 30,081, a level well under consensus measures of the value of a QALY.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16688924     DOI: 10.1177/1077558705283629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care Res Rev        ISSN: 1077-5587            Impact factor:   3.929


  15 in total

Review 1.  Economic evaluation of pay-for-performance in health care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Martin Emmert; Frank Eijkenaar; Heike Kemter; Adelheid Susanne Esslinger; Oliver Schöffski
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-06-10

2.  Performance contracting and quality improvement in outpatient treatment: effects on waiting time and length of stay.

Authors:  Maureen T Stewart; Constance M Horgan; Deborah W Garnick; Grant Ritter; A Thomas McLellan
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2012-03-23

3.  Using pay for performance to improve treatment implementation for adolescent substance use disorders: results from a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Bryan R Garner; Susan H Godley; Michael L Dennis; Brooke D Hunter; Christin M L Bair; Mark D Godley
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2012-10

Review 4.  Designing an effective pay-for-performance system in the Korean National Health Insurance.

Authors:  Hyoung-Sun Jeong
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2012-05-31

Review 5.  Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: The Role of Policy Interventions.

Authors:  Andrew Oseran; Jason H Wasfy
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-06

6.  CMS reimbursement reform and the incidence of hospital-acquired pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Risha Gidwani; Jay Bhattacharya
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Systematic review: Effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care.

Authors:  Pieter Van Herck; Delphine De Smedt; Lieven Annemans; Roy Remmen; Meredith B Rosenthal; Walter Sermeus
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  The hospital management practices in Chinese county hospitals and its association with quality of care, efficiency and finance.

Authors:  Yidan Zhu; Yifei Zhao; Lixia Dou; Ruya Guo; Xuefei Gu; Runlin Gao; Yangfeng Wu
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Design of price incentives for adjunct policy goals in formula funding for hospitals and health services.

Authors:  Stephen J Duckett
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Barriers to universal health coverage in Republic of Moldova: a policy analysis of formal and informal out-of-pocket payments.

Authors:  Taryn Vian; Frank G Feeley; Silviu Domente; Ala Negruta; Andrei Matei; Jarno Habicht
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.