| Literature DB >> 16688183 |
A S Fruchter1, A J Levan, L Strolger, P M Vreeswijk, S E Thorsett, D Bersier, I Burud, J M Castro Cerón, A J Castro-Tirado, C Conselice, T Dahlen, H C Ferguson, J P U Fynbo, P M Garnavich, R A Gibbons, J Gorosabel, T R Gull, J Hjorth, S T Holland, C Kouveliotou, Z Levay, M Livio, M R Metzger, P E Nugent, L Petro, E Pian, J E Rhoads, A G Riess, K C Sahu, A Smette, N R Tanvir, R A M J Wijers, S E Woosley.
Abstract
When massive stars exhaust their fuel, they collapse and often produce the extraordinarily bright explosions known as core-collapse supernovae. On occasion, this stellar collapse also powers an even more brilliant relativistic explosion known as a long-duration gamma-ray burst. One would then expect that these long gamma-ray bursts and core-collapse supernovae should be found in similar galactic environments. Here we show that this expectation is wrong. We find that the gamma-ray bursts are far more concentrated in the very brightest regions of their host galaxies than are the core-collapse supernovae. Furthermore, the host galaxies of the long gamma-ray bursts are significantly fainter and more irregular than the hosts of the core-collapse supernovae. Together these results suggest that long-duration gamma-ray bursts are associated with the most extremely massive stars and may be restricted to galaxies of limited chemical evolution. Our results directly imply that long gamma-ray bursts are relatively rare in galaxies such as our own Milky Way.Entities:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16688183 DOI: 10.1038/nature04787
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nature ISSN: 0028-0836 Impact factor: 49.962