Literature DB >> 16688183

Long gamma-ray bursts and core-collapse supernovae have different environments.

A S Fruchter1, A J Levan, L Strolger, P M Vreeswijk, S E Thorsett, D Bersier, I Burud, J M Castro Cerón, A J Castro-Tirado, C Conselice, T Dahlen, H C Ferguson, J P U Fynbo, P M Garnavich, R A Gibbons, J Gorosabel, T R Gull, J Hjorth, S T Holland, C Kouveliotou, Z Levay, M Livio, M R Metzger, P E Nugent, L Petro, E Pian, J E Rhoads, A G Riess, K C Sahu, A Smette, N R Tanvir, R A M J Wijers, S E Woosley.   

Abstract

When massive stars exhaust their fuel, they collapse and often produce the extraordinarily bright explosions known as core-collapse supernovae. On occasion, this stellar collapse also powers an even more brilliant relativistic explosion known as a long-duration gamma-ray burst. One would then expect that these long gamma-ray bursts and core-collapse supernovae should be found in similar galactic environments. Here we show that this expectation is wrong. We find that the gamma-ray bursts are far more concentrated in the very brightest regions of their host galaxies than are the core-collapse supernovae. Furthermore, the host galaxies of the long gamma-ray bursts are significantly fainter and more irregular than the hosts of the core-collapse supernovae. Together these results suggest that long-duration gamma-ray bursts are associated with the most extremely massive stars and may be restricted to galaxies of limited chemical evolution. Our results directly imply that long gamma-ray bursts are relatively rare in galaxies such as our own Milky Way.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 16688183     DOI: 10.1038/nature04787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  6 in total

1.  18 years of science with the Hubble Space Telescope.

Authors:  Julianne J Dalcanton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Gamma-ray bursts: Maybe not so old after all.

Authors:  Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz; William Lee
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  GRB 090423 at a redshift of z approximately 8.1.

Authors:  R Salvaterra; M Della Valle; S Campana; G Chincarini; S Covino; P D'Avanzo; A Fernández-Soto; C Guidorzi; F Mannucci; R Margutti; C C Thöne; L A Antonelli; S D Barthelmy; M De Pasquale; V D'Elia; F Fiore; D Fugazza; L K Hunt; E Maiorano; S Marinoni; F E Marshall; E Molinari; J Nousek; E Pian; J L Racusin; L Stella; L Amati; G Andreuzzi; G Cusumano; E E Fenimore; P Ferrero; P Giommi; D Guetta; S T Holland; K Hurley; G L Israel; J Mao; C B Markwardt; N Masetti; C Pagani; E Palazzi; D M Palmer; S Piranomonte; G Tagliaferri; V Testa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Kilonovae.

Authors:  Brian D Metzger
Journal:  Living Rev Relativ       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 40.429

Review 5.  Kilonovae.

Authors:  Brian D Metzger
Journal:  Living Rev Relativ       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 40.429

6.  A wind environment and Lorentz factors of tens explain gamma-ray bursts X-ray plateau.

Authors:  Hüsne Dereli-Bégué; Asaf Pe'er; Felix Ryde; Samantha R Oates; Bing Zhang; Maria G Dainotti
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 17.694

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.