Literature DB >> 16688021

Spinal fusion after revision surgery for pseudarthrosis in adult scoliosis.

Dhruv B Pateder1, Ye-Soo Park, Khaled M Kebaish, Brett M Cascio, Jacob M Buchowski, Edward W Song, Michael B Shapiro, John P Kostuik.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective study. OBJECTIVE.: To decipher the incidence, characteristics, functional outcomes, and complications of spinal fusion after revision surgery for recurrent pseudarthrosis in adult patients with scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: While the rate of spinal fusion has been examined in the past, there have been no studies that have examined the incidence, characteristics, functional outcomes, and complications of spinal fusion after pseudarthrosis repair in adult patients with scoliosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 132 patients with failed spinal fusion surgery for adult scoliosis and painful pseudarthroses were studied. Each patient had an average of 3.7 spinal surgeries before undergoing revision at our institution. In addition to clinical assessment and imaging studies, pseudarthrosis was confirmed intraoperatively in all patients. All patients underwent reinstrumentation and fusion along with adjunctive procedures as needed. Spinal fusion was assessed clinically and radiographically after surgery for a minimum of 40 months. Subjective functional outcomes and complications associated with the procedures were also studied.
RESULTS: The overall incidence of spinal fusion after revision surgery for pseudarthrosis in adult scoliosis was 90%. There was a propensity for pseudarthrosis to recur at the thoracolumbar and lumbosacral junctions. Increasing thoracolumbar kyphosis and loss of sagittal balance were significant risk factors for recurrent pseudarthrosis after revision surgery (mean thoracolumbar kyphosis of 23 degrees and mean sagittal balance of 7.9 cm anteriorly associated with persistent pseudarthrosis). Additionally, patients with multiple preoperative sites of pseudarthroses were at a higher risk for continued pseudarthrosis after surgery. Cigarette smoking, age, and surgical approach did not have any significant correlation with pseudarthrosis. Seventy-two percent of patients were satisfied with the outcome and 80% would have chosen to undergo surgery again if necessary. Thirty-three percent of patients who underwent surgery had some complication related to the surgery.
CONCLUSION: Revision surgery for pseudarthrosis repair in adult scoliosis is most successful at attaining fusion when thoracolumbar and overall sagittal alignment are restored as much as possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16688021     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000217619.57333.96

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  16 in total

Review 1.  [Importance of sagittal alignment in spinal revision surgery].

Authors:  C Klöckner; R Spur; B Wiedenhöfer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  How does a novel monoplanar pedicle screw perform biomechanically relative to monoaxial and polyaxial designs?

Authors:  Samuel R Schroerlucke; Nikolai Steklov; Gregory M Mundis; James F Marino; Behrooz A Akbarnia; Robert K Eastlack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  MIS revision of de novo scoliosis and stenosis, following open spinal instrumentation.

Authors:  Nils Hansen-Algenstaedt; SalahAddeen Khalifah; Melanie Liem; Johannes Holz; Alf Giese
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  [Complications of the lumbosacral junction in adult deformity surgery : Indications and technique for posterior and anterior revision surgery].

Authors:  A Tateen; J Bogert; H Koller; A Hempfing
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Sacropelvic fixation in adult spinal deformity (ASD); a very high rate of mechanical failure.

Authors:  Umit Ozgur Guler; Engin Cetin; Onur Yaman; Ferran Pellise; Alba Villa Casademut; Montse Domingo Sabat; Ahmet Alanay; Francesco Sanchez Perez Grueso; Emre Acaroglu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Factors influencing radiographic and clinical outcomes in adult scoliosis surgery: a study of 448 European patients.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Conny Pfanz; Oliver Meier; Wolfgang Hitzl; Michael Mayer; Viola Bullmann; Tobias L Schulte
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Fate of the adult revision spinal deformity patient: a single institution experience.

Authors:  Michael P Kelly; Lawrence G Lenke; Keith H Bridwell; Rashmi Agarwal; Jakub Godzik; Linda Koester
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Sagittal imbalance treated with L5 pedicle subtraction osteotomy with short lumbar fusion from L4 to sacrum using four screws into L4 for enhanced fixation two additional vertebral screws: a technical note.

Authors:  Kuenzang Wangdi; Bungo Otsuki; Shunsuke Fujibayashi; Shimei Tanida; Kazutaka Masamoto; Shuichi Matsuda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Rh-BMP-2 for L5-S1 arthrodesis in long fusions to the pelvis for neuromuscular spinal deformity in the pediatric age group: analysis of 11 patients.

Authors:  Loyola V Gressot; Akash J Patel; Steven W Hwang; Daniel H Fulkerson; Andrew Jea
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 1.475

10.  Comparison of long fusion terminating at L5 versus the sacrum in treating adult spinal deformity: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fei Jia; Guodong Wang; Xiaoyang Liu; Tao Li; Jianmin Sun
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.