Literature DB >> 16687561

Clinical evaluation of cellulose porous beads for the therapeutic embolization of meningiomas.

Y Kai1, J-I Hamada, M Morioka, S Yano, H Nakamura, K Makino, T Mizuno, H Takeshima, J-I Kuratsu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Cellulose porous beads (CPBs) are a new, exceptionally uniformly sized, nonabsorbable embolic agent. We evaluated their efficacy in the preoperative embolization of meningiomas.
METHODS: In 141 consecutive patients, we used CPBs (200-microm diameter) for the preoperative embolization of meningiomas. We selected patients whose tumors were > or =4 cm with 50% of blood to the tumor supplied by the external carotid artery (ECA). All patients underwent a provocation test before embolization. The percentage of blood supplied to the tumor by the internal carotid artery and ECA was determined angiographically. Nonenhanced areas on postembolization MR imaging were calculated. Intraoperative blood loss, units of blood transfusion, and hemostasis at the time of surgery were recorded for each patient. The interval between embolization and surgery was intentionally longer than 7 days.
RESULTS: Of the 141 patients, 128 underwent CBP embolization. Eleven patients had positive provocation test results, and 2 had vasospasm; they were not CBP embolized. In 72% of the patients CBP embolization achieved reduction in the flow of the feeding artery by more than 50%. The nonenhanced area on MR imaging was not significantly correlated with the degree of ECA supply or devascularization. The interval between embolization and surgery was 8-26 days (mean, 9.9 days). The longer this interval, the greater was the tumor-softening effect and the rate of tumor removal.
CONCLUSIONS: CPBs may be useful for the preoperative embolization of meningiomas. To increase the efficacy of CPB embolization, the interval to surgery should be at least 7 days.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16687561      PMCID: PMC7975727     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  26 in total

1.  (D, L) polylactide microspheres as embolic agent. A preliminary study.

Authors:  P Flandroy; C Grandfils; J Collignon; A Thibaut; N Nihant; S Barbette; R Jerome; P Teyssie
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Embolization with cellulose porous beads, II: Clinical trial.

Authors:  J Hamada; Y Kai; S Nagahiro; N Hashimoto; H Iwata; Y Ushio
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Preoperative embolization of intracranial meningiomas.

Authors:  C Manelfe; P Lasjaunias; J Ruscalleda
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Embolization with cellulose porous beads, I: An experimental study.

Authors:  J Hamada; Y Ushio; K Kazekawa; T Tsukahara; N Hashimoto; H Iwata
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Appropriate interval between embolization and surgery in patients with meningioma.

Authors:  Yutaka Kai; Jun-ichiro Hamada; Motohiro Morioka; Shigetoshi Yano; Tatemi Todaka; Yukitaka Ushio
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Dextran microsphere embolization: experimental and clinical experience with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Work in progress.

Authors:  J E Dion; R N Rankin; F Viñuela; A J Fox; A C Wallace; M Mervart
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Convenient preparation of ready-to-use particles in polyvinyl alcohol foam suspension for embolization.

Authors:  A Berenstein; D A Graeb
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Regional relative blood volume MR maps of meningiomas before and after partial embolization.

Authors:  R Bruening; R H Wu; T A Yousry; C Berchtenbreiter; J Weber; M Peller; H J Steiger; M Reiser
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Gadolinium-enhanced MR in the evaluation of preoperative meningioma embolization.

Authors:  C Grand; W O Bank; D Balériaux; C Matos; O Dewitte; J Brotchi; C Delcour
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Extended preoperative polyvinyl alcohol microembolization of intracranial meningiomas: assessment of two embolization techniques.

Authors:  A K Wakhloo; F D Juengling; V Van Velthoven; M Schumacher; J Hennig; K Schwechheimer
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  11 in total

1.  [Complication following embolization of a meningioma].

Authors:  H Becker
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 2.  Does preoperative embolization improve outcomes of meningioma resection? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fareed Jumah; Anan AbuRmilah; Bharath Raju; Suhaib Jaber; Nimer Adeeb; Vinayak Narayan; Hai Sun; Hugo Cuellar; Gaurav Gupta; Anil Nanda
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Preoperative onyx embolization of meningiomas fed by the ophthalmic artery: a case series.

Authors:  F Trivelatto; G S Nakiri; M Manisor; R Riva; M Al-Khawaldeh; I Kessler; C Mounayer
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Arterial spin labeling imaging correlates with the angiographic and clinical vascularity of vestibular schwannomas.

Authors:  Yujiro Tanaka; Michihiro Kohno; Takao Hashimoto; Nobuyuki Nakajima; Hitoshi Izawa; Hirofumi Okada; Norio Ichimasu; Ken Matsushima; Tomoya Yokoyama
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Post-embolization neurological syndrome after embolization for intracranial and skull base tumors: transient exacerbation of neurological symptoms with inflammatory responses.

Authors:  Yujiro Tanaka; Takao Hashimoto; Daisuke Watanabe; Hirofumi Okada; Daichi Kato; Shigeru Aoyagi; Jiro Akimoto; Michihiro Kohno
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  The safety and efficacy of preoperative embolization of meningioma with N-butyl cyanoacrylate.

Authors:  Hideaki Ishihara; Shoichiro Ishihara; Jun Niimi; Hiroaki Neki; Yoshiaki Kakehi; Nahoko Uemiya; Shinya Kohyama; Fumitaka Yamane; Hiroshi Kato; Tomonari Suzuki; Jun-Ichi Adachi; Kazuhiko Mishima; Ryo Nishikawa
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 1.610

7.  Preoperative cellulose porous beads for therapeutic embolization of meningioma: provocation test and technical considerations.

Authors:  Yutaka Kai; Jun-Ichiro Hamada; Motohiro Morioka; Shigetoshi Yano; Hideo Nakamura; Keishi Makino; Takamasa Mizuno; Hideo Takeshima; Jun-Ichi Kuratsu
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Is sagittal sinus resection in falcine meningiomas a factor of bad surgical outcome?

Authors:  Paulo Henrique Pires de Aguiar; Rogério Aires; Marcos Vinicius Calfatt Maldaun; Adriana Tahara; Antonio Marcos de Souza Filho; Carlos Alexandre Zicarelli; Ricardo Ramina
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2010-10-25

9.  Preoperative embolization of intracranial meningiomas: efficacy, technical considerations, and complications.

Authors:  D M S Raper; R M Starke; F Henderson; D Ding; S Simon; A J Evans; J A Jane; K C Liu
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Nationwide survey of the nature and risk factors of complications in embolization of meningiomas and other intracranial tumors: Japanese Registry of NeuroEndovascular Therapy 2 (JR-NET2).

Authors:  Tomohito Hishikawa; Kenji Sugiu; Masafumi Hiramatsu; Jun Haruma; Koji Tokunaga; Isao Date; Nobuyuki Sakai
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.