BACKGROUND: The example of ceRT proved that the expression of some D epitopes does not require D-specific amino acids. This allele denoted as RHce(R154T) caused the "false-positive" reactions that were observed in ccddee blood donors who typed positive for the D antigen with some monoclonal anti-D. No other example exposing a similar molecular mechanism was known. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Eleven donor and 1 patient ccddee samples were collected in Switzerland that typed "false-positive" with some monoclonal anti-D in bromelain technique. Their RHCE alleles were determined by nucleotide sequencing from genomic DNA and by a polymerase chain reaction with sequence-specific priming. The D epitope profile was compared to ceRT. The population frequencies were estimated in Switzerland and Germany by serology or at the molecular level, respectively. RESULTS: The "false-positive" reactions were caused by the RHCE allele RHce(S122L) occurring in the cde haplotype. Its ceSL phenotype expressed few D epitopes that belonged to the D epitope 6 group. The frequency of ceSL among D- donors was about 1:675 in the region of Bern, Switzerland. No ceSL donors were found elsewhere in Switzerland or in southwestern Germany. CONCLUSION: ceSL represented the second molecular mechanism for D antigen expression without any D-specific amino acids. ceSL and ceRT were useful to delineate the molecular mechanisms of D expression by RhCE proteins carrying amino acids not representative for the RhD proteins. The ceSL population frequencies differed significantly among three Swiss and German populations.
BACKGROUND: The example of ceRT proved that the expression of some D epitopes does not require D-specific amino acids. This allele denoted as RHce(R154T) caused the "false-positive" reactions that were observed in ccddee blood donors who typed positive for the D antigen with some monoclonal anti-D. No other example exposing a similar molecular mechanism was known. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Eleven donor and 1 patient ccddee samples were collected in Switzerland that typed "false-positive" with some monoclonal anti-D in bromelain technique. Their RHCE alleles were determined by nucleotide sequencing from genomic DNA and by a polymerase chain reaction with sequence-specific priming. The D epitope profile was compared to ceRT. The population frequencies were estimated in Switzerland and Germany by serology or at the molecular level, respectively. RESULTS: The "false-positive" reactions were caused by the RHCE allele RHce(S122L) occurring in the cde haplotype. Its ceSL phenotype expressed few D epitopes that belonged to the D epitope 6 group. The frequency of ceSL among D- donors was about 1:675 in the region of Bern, Switzerland. No ceSL donors were found elsewhere in Switzerland or in southwestern Germany. CONCLUSION: ceSL represented the second molecular mechanism for D antigen expression without any D-specific amino acids. ceSL and ceRT were useful to delineate the molecular mechanisms of D expression by RhCE proteins carrying amino acids not representative for the RhD proteins. The ceSL population frequencies differed significantly among three Swiss and German populations.