Literature DB >> 16686836

Integration of nucleic acid amplification test results into hepatitis C virus supplemental serologic testing algorithms: implications for donor counseling and revision of existing algorithms.

Steven H Kleinman1, Susan L Stramer, Jaye P Brodsky, Sally Caglioti, Michael P Busch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The routine use of hepatitis C virus (HCV) nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT) donor screening assays has provided an opportunity for revision of the current HCV supplemental testing algorithm, which requires that recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) be performed on every HCV enzyme immunoassay (EIA)-repeat-reactive donation. The FDA has approved variance requests to use a new algorithm that eliminates the need to perform RIBA when HCV NAT results are reactive. Data are provided in support of this new algorithm. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: HCV EIA (including signal-to-cutoff optical density ratio), RIBA, and NAT data were compiled from 33.2 million donations screened over an approximately 4-year period by the American Red Cross and Blood Systems Laboratories. Further, donations having specific combinations of HCV EIA, RIBA, and minipool (MP) NAT results were evaluated, with more sensitive individual-donation (ID) NAT, to construct improved counseling messages for donors.
RESULTS: Of 47,041 EIA-repeat-reactive donations, 49.3 percent were RIBA-positive, 17.1 percent RIBA-indeterminate, and 33.5 percent RIBA-negative. NAT-reactive rates were 79.2, 2.5, and 0.18 percent for RIBA-positive, -indeterminate, and -negative donations, respectively. The new algorithm classified an additional 1 percent of donations as HCV-infected while at the same time detecting all infections classified as HCV-infected under the current algorithm. An additional 2.4 percent of RIBA-positive, MP NAT-nonreactive donations were reactive when a frozen-thawed aliquot was retested by ID NAT.
CONCLUSION: Integrating HCV NAT results with RIBA results for purposes of donor notification allows more appropriate counseling messages to be given to EIA-repeat-reactive donors. The new HCV supplemental algorithm is an acceptable alternative to the current algorithm because it provides equivalent or superior accuracy in formulating donor counseling messages and may also result in reduced costs and more timely notification of infected donors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16686836     DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00787.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  4 in total

1.  Follow-up testing for hepatitis C virus infection: an analysis of Massachusetts surveillance data, 2007-2010.

Authors:  Kerri Barton; Dan Church; Shauna Onofrey; Noelle Cocoros; Alfred DeMaria
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Role of signal-to-cut-off ratios of anti-hepatitis C virus antibody by enzyme immunoassays along with ID-NAT for screening of whole blood donors in India.

Authors:  Satyam Arora; Veena Doda
Journal:  Asian J Transfus Sci       Date:  2016 Jan-Jun

3.  Hepatitis C virus in blood donors, Brazil.

Authors:  Kátia Luz Torres; Adriana Malheiro; Adriana Tateno; Tatiane Amabile de-Lima; Laura Patricia Viana-Maia; João Paulo Diniz-Pimentel; Márcia Poinho Encarnação-de-Morais; Christiane Santana de-Melo-Usui; Flavia de-Oliveira-Braga; Igor Araújo Ferreira-Silva; Felicien Vasquez; José Eduardo-Levi
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.883

4.  True positivity of anti-Hepatitis C Virus Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay reactive blood donors: A prospective study done in western India.

Authors:  Sunita Tulsiani; Nabajyoti Choudhury; Priti Desai; Ripal Shah; Ankit Mathur; V Harimoorthy; Jwalant Shah
Journal:  Asian J Transfus Sci       Date:  2012-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.