BACKGROUND: Despite advances in treatment of diabetes, many barriers to good glycemic control remain. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between glycemic control and the driving distance from home to the site of primary care. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of data from the Vermont Diabetes Information System. PARTICIPANTS: Nine-hundred and seventy-three adults with diabetes in primary care. The mean age was 64.9 years, 57% were female, and 18.4% used insulin. MEASUREMENTS: Hemoglobin A1c, shortest driving distance from a patient's home to the site of primary care calculated by geographic software, self-reported gender, age, education, income, marital status, race, insurance coverage, diabetic complications, and use of insulin and oral hypoglycemic agents. RESULTS: Controlling for social, demographic, seasonal, and treatment variables, there was a positive, significant relationship between glycemic control and driving distance (beta=+0.07%/10 km, P<.001, 95% confidence interval [CI]=+0.03, +0.11). Driving distance had a stronger association with glycemic control among insulin users (beta=+0.22%/10 km, P=.016, 95% CI=+0.04, +0.40) than among noninsulin users (beta=+0.06%/10 km, P=.006, 95% CI=+0.02, +0.10). CONCLUSION: Longer driving distances from home to the site of primary care were associated with poorer glycemic control in this population of older, rural subjects. While the mechanism for this effect is not known, providers should be aware of this potential barrier to good glycemic control.
BACKGROUND: Despite advances in treatment of diabetes, many barriers to good glycemic control remain. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between glycemic control and the driving distance from home to the site of primary care. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of data from the Vermont Diabetes Information System. PARTICIPANTS: Nine-hundred and seventy-three adults with diabetes in primary care. The mean age was 64.9 years, 57% were female, and 18.4% used insulin. MEASUREMENTS: Hemoglobin A1c, shortest driving distance from a patient's home to the site of primary care calculated by geographic software, self-reported gender, age, education, income, marital status, race, insurance coverage, diabetic complications, and use of insulin and oral hypoglycemic agents. RESULTS: Controlling for social, demographic, seasonal, and treatment variables, there was a positive, significant relationship between glycemic control and driving distance (beta=+0.07%/10 km, P<.001, 95% confidence interval [CI]=+0.03, +0.11). Driving distance had a stronger association with glycemic control among insulin users (beta=+0.22%/10 km, P=.016, 95% CI=+0.04, +0.40) than among noninsulin users (beta=+0.06%/10 km, P=.006, 95% CI=+0.02, +0.10). CONCLUSION: Longer driving distances from home to the site of primary care were associated with poorer glycemic control in this population of older, rural subjects. While the mechanism for this effect is not known, providers should be aware of this potential barrier to good glycemic control.
Authors: Charles D MacLean; Benjamin Littenberg; Michael Gagnon; Mimi Reardon; Paul D Turner; Cy Jordan Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2004 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Jinan B Saaddine; Michael M Engelgau; Gloria L Beckles; Edward W Gregg; Theodore J Thompson; K M Venkat Narayan Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2002-04-16 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Sara A Quandt; Teresa Reynolds; Christine Chapman; Ronny A Bell; Joseph G Grzywacz; Edward H Ip; Julienne K Kirk; Thomas A Arcury Journal: J Appl Gerontol Date: 2013-10
Authors: Janice C Zgibor; Laura B Gieraltowski; Evelyn O Talbott; Anthony Fabio; Ravi K Sharma; Karimi Hassan Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2011-05-01
Authors: April D Kimmel; Steven P Masiano; Rose S Bono; Erika G Martin; Faye Z Belgrave; Adaora A Adimora; Bassam Dahman; Hadiza Galadima; Lindsay M Sabik Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2018-05-30
Authors: Amanda H Salanitro; Monika M Safford; Thomas K Houston; Jessica H Williams; Fernando Ovalle; Pamela Payne-Foster; Jeroan J Allison; Carlos A Estrada Journal: J Natl Med Assoc Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 1.798