Literature DB >> 16686106

Specialization and semantic organization: evidence for multiple semantics linked to sensory modalities.

J Frederico Marques1.   

Abstract

The present article reviews the case for multiple systems in semantic memory and empirically evaluates a multiple semantics proposal based on sensory modalities. In the experiments, a conceptual switching cost paradigm was used (Pecher, Zeelenberg, & Barsalou, 2003), in which participants verified properties for concepts and verification time was compared for target trials (e.g., a dog can bark) that were preceded by context trials of either the same or a different modality (e.g., a bee can buzz or a horse can have spots). Experiment 1 involved a modality switch while controlling for the concept's category and demonstrated that when modalities were switched, a processing cost was incurred that could not be attributed to the latter dimension. Experiment 2 further supported this conclusion by showing that, in a reverse situation, the cost incurred when category was switched was at least smaller. The results are discussed by considering possible alternative amodal explanations and other data that have shown the influence of sensory information in conceptual processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16686106     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  28 in total

1.  Temporal cost of switching between kinds of visual stimuli in a memory task.

Authors:  V Kavcic; F J Krar; R W Doty
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2000-03

2.  Crossmodal links between vision and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention.

Authors:  C Spence; F Pavani; J Driver
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Verifying different-modality properties for concepts produces switching costs.

Authors:  Diane Pecher; René Zeelenberg; Lawrence W Barsalou
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-03

4.  Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems.

Authors:  Lawrence W. Barsalou; W Kyle Simmons; Aron K. Barbey; Christine D. Wilson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  The selective impairment of fruit and vegetable knowledge:amultiple processing channels account of fine-grain category specificity.

Authors:  Sebastian J Crutch; Elizabeth K Warrington
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 6.  Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain the animate-inanimate distinction.

Authors:  A Caramazza; J R Shelton
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Explaining category-related effects in the retrieval of conceptual and lexical knowledge for concrete entities: operationalization and analysis of factors.

Authors:  D Tranel; C G Logan; R J Frank; A R Damasio
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge.

Authors:  A Martin; C L Wiggs; L G Ungerleider; J V Haxby
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Is there an anatomical basis for category-specificity? Semantic memory studies in PET and fMRI.

Authors:  Joseph T Devlin; Richard P Russell; Matthew H Davis; Cathy J Price; Helen E Moss; M Jalal Fadili; Lorraine K Tyler
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  The organization of conceptual knowledge: the evidence from category-specific semantic deficits.

Authors:  Alfonso Caramazza; Bradford Z. Mahon
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  13 in total

1.  Object manipulability affects children's and adults' conceptual processing.

Authors:  Solène Kalénine; Françoise Bonthoux
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-06

2.  Concepts are not represented by conscious imagery.

Authors:  Diane Pecher; Saskia van Dantzig; Hendrik N J Schifferstein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

3.  The Multilevel Modality-Switch Effect: What Happens When We See the Bees Buzzing and Hear the Diamonds Glistening.

Authors:  Elisa Scerrati; Luisa Lugli; Roberto Nicoletti; Anna Maria Borghi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

4.  Mental states inside out: switching costs for emotional and nonemotional sentences that differ in internal and external focus.

Authors:  Suzanne Oosterwijk; Piotr Winkielman; Diane Pecher; René Zeelenberg; Mark Rotteveel; Agneta H Fischer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-01

5.  The Neuroscience of Storing and Molding Tool Action Concepts: How "Plastic" is Grounded Cognition?

Authors:  J C Mizelle; Lewis A Wheaton
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-11-15

6.  A sharp image or a sharp knife: norms for the modality-exclusivity of 774 concept-property items.

Authors:  Saskia van Dantzig; Rosemary A Cowell; René Zeelenberg; Diane Pecher
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2011-03

7.  Switching Modalities in A Sentence Verification Task: ERP Evidence for Embodied Language Processing.

Authors:  Lea A Hald; Julie-Ann Marshall; Dirk P Janssen; Alan Garnham
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-03-18

8.  Modality Switching in a Property Verification Task: An ERP Study of What Happens When Candles Flicker after High Heels Click.

Authors:  Jennifer Collins; Diane Pecher; René Zeelenberg; Seana Coulson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-02-08

9.  Perceptual and Interoceptive Strength Norms for 270 French Words.

Authors:  Aurélie Miceli; Erika Wauthia; Laurent Lefebvre; Laurence Ris; Isabelle Simoes Loureiro
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-11

10.  Exploring modality switching effects in negated sentences: further evidence for grounded representations.

Authors:  Lea A Hald; Ian Hocking; David Vernon; Julie-Ann Marshall; Alan Garnham
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.