Literature DB >> 16685097

Technical errors during medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction could overload medial patellofemoral cartilage: a computational analysis.

John J Elias1, Andrew J Cosgarea.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The influence of reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament on the patellofemoral force and pressure distributions has not yet been investigated. HYPOTHESIS: Technical errors can cause tension to develop within a reconstructed medial patellofemoral ligament, which will adversely alter the normal patellofemoral force distribution by increasing the load applied to the medial cartilage. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: Four computational knee models were used to simulate knee function from 30 degrees to 90 degrees of flexion with (1) an intact medial patellofemoral ligament, (2) an anatomically correct reconstruction using a double hamstring tendon autograft, (3) a 5-mm proximally malpositioned femoral attachment site, (4) a graft that is 3 mm shorter than the intact medial patellofemoral ligament, and (5) combined proximal malpositioning and a short graft.
RESULTS: The results were similar for the intact and anatomically reconstructed medial patellofemoral ligament. Proximal malpositioning of the femoral attachment and using a short graft increased the graft tension during flexion, which decreased the lateral force and the lateral tilt moment acting on the patella. When a short graft was combined with proximal malpositioning, the compressive force applied to the medial cartilage at least doubled at low flexion angles, which increased the peak medial pressure by more than 50% at low flexion angles.
CONCLUSION: When the medial patellofemoral ligament is reconstructed, small errors in graft length and position can dramatically increase the force and pressure applied to medial patellofemoral cartilage. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Overloading the medial cartilage after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction could lead to degradation, pain, and arthrosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16685097     DOI: 10.1177/0363546506287486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  93 in total

1.  Radiographic landmarks for tunnel placement in reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament.

Authors:  A J Barnett; N R Howells; B J Burston; A Ansari; D Clark; J D Eldridge
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Arthroscopic extraarticular reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament with gracilis tendon autograft - surgical technique.

Authors:  Rainer Siebold; Carlo Angelo V Borbon
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-07       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  [Musculoskeletal modeling of the patellofemoral joint. Dynamic analysis of patellar tracking].

Authors:  S Herrmann; R Lenz; A Geier; S Lehner; R Souffrant; C Woernle; T Tischer; R Bader
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  [Anatomical double-bundle reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament with a gracilis autograft].

Authors:  S Quirbach; V Smekal; R E Rosenberger; R El Attal; P B Schöttle
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.154

5.  Functional bundles of the medial patellofemoral ligament.

Authors:  Hui Jun Kang; Fei Wang; Bai Cheng Chen; Yan Ling Su; Zhan Chi Zhang; Chang Bao Yan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  A Finite Element Analysis of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Nicole A DeVries Watson; Kyle R Duchman; Matthew J Bollier; Nicole M Grosland
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2015

7.  Femoral insertion site of the graft used to replace the medial patellofemoral ligament influences the ligament dynamic changes during knee flexion and the clinical outcome.

Authors:  Vicente Sanchis-Alfonso; Cristina Ramirez-Fuentes; Erik Montesinos-Berry; Julio Domenech; Luis Martí-Bonmatí
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Biomechanical evaluation of medial patello-femoral ligament reconstruction: comparison between a double-bundle converging tunnels technique versus a single-bundle technique.

Authors:  G Placella; A Speziali; E Sebastiani; S Morello; M M Tei; G Cerulli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-02-12

9.  Biomechanical evaluation of MPFL reconstructions: differences in dynamic contact pressure between gracilis and fascia lata graft.

Authors:  Olaf Lorbach; Alexander Haupert; Turgay Efe; Antonius Pizanis; Imke Weyers; Dieter Kohn; Matthias Kieb
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Hee-Soo Kyung; Hee-June Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.