PURPOSES: Little information is available on the utilization of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) in the United States. Accordingly, we performed a survey on the use of NPPV at acute care hospitals in a region of the United States to determine variations in utilization and between hospitals, the reasons for lower rates of utilization, and the techniques used for application. METHODS: Using survey methodology, we developed a questionnaire consisting of 19 questions and distributed it by mail to directors of respiratory care at all 82 acute care hospitals in Massachusetts and Rhode Island. Nonresponders were contacted by phone to complete the survey. Responses were analyzed using standard statistics, including t tests and Mann-Whitney U tests where appropriate. RESULTS: We obtained responses from 71 of the 82 hospitals (88%). The overall utilization rate for NPPV was 20% of ventilator starts, but we found enormous variation in the estimated utilization rates among different hospitals, from none to > 50%. The top two reasons given for lower utilization rates were a lack of physician knowledge and inadequate equipment. In the 19 hospitals that provided detailed information, COPD and congestive heart failure constituted 82% of the diagnoses of patients receiving NPPV, but NPPV was still used in only 33% of patients with these diagnoses receiving any form of mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: The utilization rates for NPPV vary enormously among different acute care hospitals within the same region. The perceived reasons for lower utilization rates include lack of physician knowledge, insufficient respiratory therapist training, and inadequate equipment. Educational programs directed at individual institutions may be useful to enhance utilization rates.
PURPOSES: Little information is available on the utilization of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) in the United States. Accordingly, we performed a survey on the use of NPPV at acute care hospitals in a region of the United States to determine variations in utilization and between hospitals, the reasons for lower rates of utilization, and the techniques used for application. METHODS: Using survey methodology, we developed a questionnaire consisting of 19 questions and distributed it by mail to directors of respiratory care at all 82 acute care hospitals in Massachusetts and Rhode Island. Nonresponders were contacted by phone to complete the survey. Responses were analyzed using standard statistics, including t tests and Mann-Whitney U tests where appropriate. RESULTS: We obtained responses from 71 of the 82 hospitals (88%). The overall utilization rate for NPPV was 20% of ventilator starts, but we found enormous variation in the estimated utilization rates among different hospitals, from none to > 50%. The top two reasons given for lower utilization rates were a lack of physician knowledge and inadequate equipment. In the 19 hospitals that provided detailed information, COPD and congestive heart failure constituted 82% of the diagnoses of patients receiving NPPV, but NPPV was still used in only 33% of patients with these diagnoses receiving any form of mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: The utilization rates for NPPV vary enormously among different acute care hospitals within the same region. The perceived reasons for lower utilization rates include lack of physician knowledge, insufficient respiratory therapist training, and inadequate equipment. Educational programs directed at individual institutions may be useful to enhance utilization rates.
Authors: Genevieve Christina Digby; Sean P Keenan; Christopher M Parker; Tasnim Sinuff; Karen E Burns; Sangeeta Mehta; Juan J Ronco; Demetrios J Kutsogiannis; Louise Rose; Najib T Ayas; Luc R Berthiaume; Christine L D'Arsigny; Daniel E Stollery; John Muscedere Journal: Can Respir J Date: 2015-10-15 Impact factor: 2.409
Authors: Kimberly A Fisher; Kathleen M Mazor; Sarah Goff; Mihaela S Stefan; Penelope S Pekow; Lauren A Williams; Vida Rastegar; Michael B Rothberg; Nicholas S Hill; Peter K Lindenauer Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2017-11
Authors: Divay Chandra; Jason A Stamm; Brian Taylor; Rose Mary Ramos; Lewis Satterwhite; Jerry A Krishnan; David Mannino; Frank C Sciurba; Fernando Holguín Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2011-10-20 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Mihaela S Stefan; Aruna Priya; Penelope S Pekow; Tara Lagu; Jay S Steingrub; Nicholas S Hill; Brian H Nathanson; Peter K Lindenauer Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2017-05-23 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: Peter K Lindenauer; Mihaela S Stefan; Meng-Shiou Shieh; Penelope S Pekow; Michael B Rothberg; Nicholas S Hill Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Philipp G H Metnitz; Barbara Metnitz; Rui P Moreno; Peter Bauer; Lorenzo Del Sorbo; Christoph Hoermann; Susana Afonso de Carvalho; V Marco Ranieri Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-03-14 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Robert A Stone; Brian D W Harrison; Derek Lowe; Rhona J Buckingham; Nancy A Pursey; Harold S R Hosker; Jonathan M Potter; C Michael Roberts Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2009-09-24 Impact factor: 2.655