Literature DB >> 16683993

Quality of life assessment in clinical practice in haemophilia treatment.

A Gringeri1, L Mantovani, S V Mackensen.   

Abstract

The modern management of haemophilia has greatly influenced not only survival of patients, their clinical symptoms and orthopaedic outcome but also their perceived quality of life (QoL). QoL measures recently became an essential part of clinical trials being one of the most important patient-rated outcomes (PROs). Moreover, QoL assessment is essential in pharmacoeconomics. In clinical trials, not only clinical outcomes but also the so-called PROs and health-economic outcomes are included. Different types of economic evaluations may be conducted in order to describe the economic burden of a disease condition, to determine the cost of care and to assess and evaluate alternative treatments in terms of both costs and effects as well as benefits and outcomes with the aim of optimizing the use of resources. For these evaluations, the following analyses are performed: descriptive cost of illness study, incremental cost-effectiveness analysis, incremental cost-utility analysis and incremental cost-benefit analysis. By contrast, PROs are derived from direct patient reports and they allow to evaluate the impact of a disease and its treatment on patients' well-being and functioning. PROs include health-related quality of life, patient preferences/utilities, treatment satisfaction and other PROs such as functional assessment, etc. Choosing a QoL measure, study- and instrument-related aspects have to be taken into account. Finally, QoL assessment will become a part of the regular clinical assessment of persons with haemophilia, in order to provide trustworthy data of perceived well-being to be compared over time and in order to assess treatment efficacy and quality of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16683993     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2006.01257.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haemophilia        ISSN: 1351-8216            Impact factor:   4.287


  9 in total

1.  Issues in the measurement of quality of life in hemophilia.

Authors:  Brian M Feldman
Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter       Date:  2013

2.  Health-related quality of life in hemophilia: results of the Hemophilia-Specific Quality of Life Index (Haem-a-Qol) at a Brazilian blood center.

Authors:  Adriana Aparecida Ferreira; Isabel Cristina Gonçalves Leite; Maria Teresa Bustamante-Teixeira; Camila Soares Lima Corrêa; Danielle Teles da Cruz; Daniela de Oliveira Werneck Rodrigues; Monica Calil Borges Ferreira
Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter       Date:  2013

3.  Content comparison of haemophilia specific patient-rated outcome measures with the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF, ICF-CY).

Authors:  Silvia Riva; Monika Bullinger; Edda Amann; Sylvia von Mackensen
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 3.186

4.  Clinical, humanistic, and economic burden of severe hemophilia B in the United States: Results from the CHESS US and CHESS US+ population surveys.

Authors:  Tom Burke; Sohaib Asghar; Jamie O'Hara; Eileen K Sawyer; Nanxin Li
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 4.123

5.  The impact of extended half-life factor concentrates on patient reported health outcome measures in persons with hemophilia A and hemophilia B.

Authors:  Haowei Linda Sun; Ming Yang; Man-Chiu Poon; Adrienne Lee; K Sue Robinson; Michelle Sholzberg; John Wu; Alfonso Iorio; Victor Blanchette; Manuel Carcao; Robert J Klaassen; Shannon Jackson
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2021-10-11

Review 6.  The management of hemophilia in elderly patients.

Authors:  Massimo Franchini; Annarita Tagliaferri; Pier Mannuccio Mannucci
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.458

Review 7.  Is There Evidence for Neurocognitive Dysfunctions in Patients with Postnatal HIV Infection? A Review on the Cohort of Hemophilia Patients.

Authors:  Silvia Riva; Ilaria Cutica; Gabriella Pravettoni
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Randomized comparison of prophylaxis and on-demand regimens with FEIBA NF in the treatment of haemophilia A and B with inhibitors.

Authors:  S V Antunes; S Tangada; O Stasyshyn; V Mamonov; J Phillips; N Guzman-Becerra; A Grigorian; B Ewenstein; W-Y Wong
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 4.287

Review 9.  Measuring therapeutic relationship in the care of patients with haemophilia: A scoping review.

Authors:  Erin McCabe; Maxi Miciak; Liz Dennett; Patricia Manns; Christine Guptill; Jeremy Hall; Douglas P Gross
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.377

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.