R J Gurrera1, J Moye, M J Karel, A R Azar, J C Armesto. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA. Ronald.Gurrera@med.va.gov
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the contribution of neuropsychological test performance to treatment decision-making capacity in community volunteers with mild to moderate dementia. METHODS: The authors recruited volunteers (44 men, 44 women) with mild to moderate dementia from the community. Subjects completed a battery of 11 neuropsychological tests that assessed auditory and visual attention, logical memory, language, and executive function. To measure decision making capacity, the authors administered the Capacity to Consent to Treatment Interview, the Hopemont Capacity Assessment Interview, and the MacCarthur Competence Assessment Tool--Treatment. Each of these instruments individually scores four decisional abilities serving capacity: understanding, appreciation, reasoning, and expression of choice. The authors used principal components analysis to generate component scores for each ability across instruments, and to extract principal components for neuropsychological performance. RESULTS: Multiple linear regression analyses demonstrated that neuropsychological performance significantly predicted all four abilities. Specifically, it predicted 77.8% of the common variance for understanding, 39.4% for reasoning, 24.6% for appreciation, and 10.2% for expression of choice. Except for reasoning and appreciation, neuropsychological predictor (beta) profiles were unique for each ability. CONCLUSIONS: Neuropsychological performance substantially and differentially predicted capacity for treatment decisions in individuals with mild to moderate dementia. Relationships between elemental cognitive function and decisional capacity may differ in individuals whose decisional capacity is impaired by other disorders, such as mental illness.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the contribution of neuropsychological test performance to treatment decision-making capacity in community volunteers with mild to moderate dementia. METHODS: The authors recruited volunteers (44 men, 44 women) with mild to moderate dementia from the community. Subjects completed a battery of 11 neuropsychological tests that assessed auditory and visual attention, logical memory, language, and executive function. To measure decision making capacity, the authors administered the Capacity to Consent to Treatment Interview, the Hopemont Capacity Assessment Interview, and the MacCarthur Competence Assessment Tool--Treatment. Each of these instruments individually scores four decisional abilities serving capacity: understanding, appreciation, reasoning, and expression of choice. The authors used principal components analysis to generate component scores for each ability across instruments, and to extract principal components for neuropsychological performance. RESULTS: Multiple linear regression analyses demonstrated that neuropsychological performance significantly predicted all four abilities. Specifically, it predicted 77.8% of the common variance for understanding, 39.4% for reasoning, 24.6% for appreciation, and 10.2% for expression of choice. Except for reasoning and appreciation, neuropsychological predictor (beta) profiles were unique for each ability. CONCLUSIONS: Neuropsychological performance substantially and differentially predicted capacity for treatment decisions in individuals with mild to moderate dementia. Relationships between elemental cognitive function and decisional capacity may differ in individuals whose decisional capacity is impaired by other disorders, such as mental illness.
Authors: Cynthia Z Burton; Elizabeth W Twamley; Lana C Lee; Barton W Palmer; Dilip V Jeste; Laura B Dunn; Scott A Irwin Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Michael R Basso; Philip J Candilis; Jay Johnson; Courtney Ghormley; Dennis R Combs; Taeh Ward Journal: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 2.475
Authors: Lisa Sweet; Dimitrios Adamis; David J Meagher; Daniel Davis; David C Currow; Shirley H Bush; Christopher Barnes; Michael Hartwick; Meera Agar; Jessica Simon; William Breitbart; Neil MacDonald; Peter G Lawlor Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2013-12-31 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Kristen L Triebel; Thomas A Novack; Richard Kennedy; Roy C Martin; Laura E Dreer; Rema Raman; Daniel C Marson Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2016 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.710
Authors: Jennifer Hagerty Lingler; Karen B Hirschman; Linda Garand; Mary Amanda Dew; James T Becker; Richard Schulz; Steven T Dekosky Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Betty S Black; Jason Brandt; Peter V Rabins; Quincy M Samus; Cynthia D Steele; Constantine G Lyketsos; Adam Rosenblatt Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 4.105