BACKGROUND: Abnormal paroxysmal events in sleep may be parasomnias or epileptic seizures. In nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy (NFLE), the unusual seizure features often lead to diagnostic confusion with nonepileptic parasomnias; video-electroencephalography monitoring is usually required to make the diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To examine the reliability of the clinical history in diagnosing NFLE, using the Frontal Lobe Epilepsy and Parasomnias (FLEP) scale. DESIGN: The FLEP scale, comprising specific questions reflecting the diagnostic features of NFLE and parasomnias, was developed by an expert panel following review of the literature. It was then validated in a sample of individuals with firmly diagnosed nocturnal events. SETTING: Patients were recruited after appropriate diagnostic workup in tertiary sleep and epilepsy referral centers in Melbourne, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-two patients (45 males) [corrected] with paroxysmal nocturnal events. Intervention Two independent interviews were conducted in each case, with the patient and a witness, by researchers blinded to the diagnosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The diagnosis obtained from scores on the FLEP scale was compared with the confirmed diagnosis in each patient. RESULTS: Nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy was correctly diagnosed from the FLEP score in 31 of 31 patients, with a sensitivity of 1.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-1.00), specificity of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.73-0.97), positive predictive value of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.75-0.97), and negative predictive value of 1.00 (95% CI, 0.85-1.00). CONCLUSIONS: A diagnosis of NFLE can be made reliably using the clinical features identified in the FLEP scale. This may reduce the requirement for tertiary referral and extensive inpatient monitoring.
BACKGROUND: Abnormal paroxysmal events in sleep may be parasomnias or epilepticseizures. In nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy (NFLE), the unusual seizure features often lead to diagnostic confusion with nonepileptic parasomnias; video-electroencephalography monitoring is usually required to make the diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To examine the reliability of the clinical history in diagnosing NFLE, using the Frontal Lobe Epilepsy and Parasomnias (FLEP) scale. DESIGN: The FLEP scale, comprising specific questions reflecting the diagnostic features of NFLE and parasomnias, was developed by an expert panel following review of the literature. It was then validated in a sample of individuals with firmly diagnosed nocturnal events. SETTING:Patients were recruited after appropriate diagnostic workup in tertiary sleep and epilepsy referral centers in Melbourne, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-two patients (45 males) [corrected] with paroxysmal nocturnal events. Intervention Two independent interviews were conducted in each case, with the patient and a witness, by researchers blinded to the diagnosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The diagnosis obtained from scores on the FLEP scale was compared with the confirmed diagnosis in each patient. RESULTS:Nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy was correctly diagnosed from the FLEP score in 31 of 31 patients, with a sensitivity of 1.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-1.00), specificity of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.73-0.97), positive predictive value of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.75-0.97), and negative predictive value of 1.00 (95% CI, 0.85-1.00). CONCLUSIONS: A diagnosis of NFLE can be made reliably using the clinical features identified in the FLEP scale. This may reduce the requirement for tertiary referral and extensive inpatient monitoring.
Authors: Jan Rémi; Thomas Pollmächer; Kai Spiegelhalder; Claudia Trenkwalder; Peter Young Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2019-10-11 Impact factor: 5.594