OBJECTIVE: To assess effects on condom use and other sexual behaviour of an HIV prevention programme at school that promotes the use of condoms with and without emergency contraception. DESIGN: Cluster randomised controlled trial. SETTING: 40 public high schools in the state of Morelos, Mexico. PARTICIPANTS: 10 954 first year high school students. INTERVENTION: Schools were randomised to one of three arms: an HIV prevention course that promoted condom use, the same course with emergency contraception as back-up, or the existing sex education course. Self administered anonymous questionnaires were completed at baseline, four months, and 16 months. Students at intervention schools received a 30 hour course (over 15 weeks) on HIV prevention and life skills, designed in accordance with guidelines of the joint United Nations programme on HIV/AIDS. Two extra hours of education on emergency contraception were given to students in the condom promotion with contraception arm. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measure was reported condom use. Other outcomes were reported sexual activity; knowledge and attitudes about HIV and emergency contraception; and attitudes and confidence about condom use. RESULTS: Intervention did not affect reported condom use. Knowledge of HIV improved in both intervention arms and knowledge of emergency contraception improved in the condom promotion with contraception arm. Reported sexual behaviour was similar in the intervention arms and the control group. CONCLUSION: A rigorously designed, implemented, and evaluated HIV education course based in public high schools did not reduce risk behaviour, so such courses need to be redesigned and evaluated. Addition of emergency contraception did not decrease reported condom use or increase risky sexual behaviour but did increase reported use of emergency contraception.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To assess effects on condom use and other sexual behaviour of an HIV prevention programme at school that promotes the use of condoms with and without emergency contraception. DESIGN: Cluster randomised controlled trial. SETTING: 40 public high schools in the state of Morelos, Mexico. PARTICIPANTS: 10 954 first year high school students. INTERVENTION: Schools were randomised to one of three arms: an HIV prevention course that promoted condom use, the same course with emergency contraception as back-up, or the existing sex education course. Self administered anonymous questionnaires were completed at baseline, four months, and 16 months. Students at intervention schools received a 30 hour course (over 15 weeks) on HIV prevention and life skills, designed in accordance with guidelines of the joint United Nations programme on HIV/AIDS. Two extra hours of education on emergency contraception were given to students in the condom promotion with contraception arm. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measure was reported condom use. Other outcomes were reported sexual activity; knowledge and attitudes about HIV and emergency contraception; and attitudes and confidence about condom use. RESULTS: Intervention did not affect reported condom use. Knowledge of HIV improved in both intervention arms and knowledge of emergency contraception improved in the condom promotion with contraception arm. Reported sexual behaviour was similar in the intervention arms and the control group. CONCLUSION: A rigorously designed, implemented, and evaluated HIV education course based in public high schools did not reduce risk behaviour, so such courses need to be redesigned and evaluated. Addition of emergency contraception did not decrease reported condom use or increase risky sexual behaviour but did increase reported use of emergency contraception.
Authors: A Langer; C Harper; C Garcia-Barrios; R Schiavon; A Heimburger; B Elul; S Renoso Delgado; C Ellertson Journal: Contraception Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Melina M Bersamin; Samantha Walker; Elizabeth D Waiters; Deborah A Fisher; Joel W Grube Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Tina R Raine; Cynthia C Harper; Corinne H Rocca; Richard Fischer; Nancy Padian; Jeffrey D Klausner; Philip D Darney Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-01-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Harsha Thirumurthy; Markus Goldstein; Joshua Graff Zivin; James Habyarimana; Cristian Pop-Eleches Journal: Forum Health Econ Policy Date: 2012-04-19
Authors: Tania B Huedo-Medina; Marcy H Boynton; Michelle R Warren; Jessica M Lacroix; Michael P Carey; Blair T Johnson Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2010-12
Authors: Chioma Oringanje; Martin M Meremikwu; Hokehe Eko; Ekpereonne Esu; Anne Meremikwu; John E Ehiri Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-02-03
Authors: Virginia A Fonner; Kevin S Armstrong; Caitlin E Kennedy; Kevin R O'Reilly; Michael D Sweat Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-03-04 Impact factor: 3.240