Literature DB >> 16682384

A comparison of dual vs. triple antiplatelet therapy in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: results of the ELISA-2 trial.

Saman Rasoul1, Jan Paul Ottervanger, Menko-Jan de Boer, Kor Miedema, Jan C A Hoorntje, Marcel Gosselink, Felix Zijlstra, Harry Suryapranata, Jan-Henk E Dambrink, Arnoud W J van 't Hof.   

Abstract

AIMS: To compare dual vs. triple antiplatelet pre-treatment in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE ACS) who were planned for early catheterization. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 328 consecutive patients with NSTE ACS were included and were randomized to pre-treatment with dual (n = 166, aspirin, clopidogrel 600 mg) or triple antiplatelet therapy (n = 162, aspirin, clopidogrel 300 mg, and Tirofiban). The primary endpoint was enzymatic infarct size, defined as cumulative LDH release (LDHQ(48)). Initial TIMI flow of the culprit vessel was a pre-specified secondary endpoint. Angiography was performed in 98% of patients at a median of 23 h after admission. Enzymatic infarct size (median, 25-75%) was 166 (60-349) IU/L in the triple group compared with 193 (75-466) IU/L in the dual group (P = 0.2). Initial TIMI 3 flow of the culprit vessel was significantly more often observed after triple antiplatelet therapy (67 vs. 47%, P = 0.002). At 30 days follow-up, myocardial infarction (MI) occurred in 46% of patients in the triple antiplatelet group, compared with 57% in the dual antiplatelet group, P = 0.052. No significant difference in bleeding was present.
CONCLUSION: This study showed that in patients with NSTE ACS, triple antiplatelet pre-treatment was associated with a non-significant reduction in enzymatic infarct size, a significantly better initial perfusion of the culprit vessel, and a trend towards a better survival without death or MI. Further, large-scale studies should be performed to find whether the beneficial trend in favour of triple antiplatelet pre-treatment can be reproduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16682384     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  9 in total

1.  Routine upstream versus selective down stream use of tirofiban in non-ST elevation myocardial infarction patients scheduled for early invasive therapy; a randomized comparison.

Authors:  Saman Rasoul; Jan Paul Ottervanger; Menko Jan de Boer; Jan Henk E Dambrink; Harry Suryapranata; Jan C A Hoorntje; A T Marcel Gosselink; Arnoud W J van 't Hof
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 2.  Triple antiplatelet therapy for preventing vascular events: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chamila Geeganage; Robert Wilcox; Philip M W Bath
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 8.775

3.  Would tirofiban have been shown non-inferior to abciximab had the TENACITY trial not been terminated for financial reasons?

Authors:  Peter B Berger; Judson B Williams; Vic Hasselblad; Karen Chiswell; Karen S Pieper; Robert M Califf
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Are patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction undertreated?

Authors:  Saman Rasoul; Jan Paul Ottervanger; Jan-Henk E Dambrink; Menko-Jan de Boer; Jan C A Hoorntje; A T Marcel Gosselink; Felix Zijlstra; Harry Suryapranata; Arnoud W J van 't Hof
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2007-03-05       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 5.  Selecting the optimal antithrombotic regimen for patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Shailja V Parikh; Ellen C Keeley
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2009-08-20

6.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance of scar and ischemia burden early after acute ST elevation and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Sven Plein; John F Younger; Patrick Sparrow; John P Ridgway; Stephen G Ball; John P Greenwood
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 7.  Percutaneous coronary intervention in treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Paweł Gąsior; Piotr Desperak; Karolina Gierlaszyńska; Michał Hawranek; Marek Gierlotka; Mariusz Gąsior; Lech Poloński
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 1.426

8.  Dual versus single antiplatelet therapy for patients with long-term oral anticoagulation undergoing coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing-Jing Yu; Chan Zou; Wen-Yu Liu; Guo-Ping Yang
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.327

9.  Early and long-term outcomes of complete revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease presenting with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Michał Hawranek; Piotr Desperak; Paweł Gąsior; Aneta Desperak; Andrzej Lekston; Mariusz Gąsior
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 1.426

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.