Literature DB >> 16682287

Favorable outcome of triploid neuroblastomas: a contribution to the special oncogenesis of neuroblastoma.

Ruediger Spitz1, David R Betts, Thorsten Simon, Marc Boensch, Joern Oestreich, Felix K Niggli, Karen Ernestus, Frank Berthold, Barbara Hero.   

Abstract

There is a well-known association between patient outcome and tumor ploidy in neuroblastoma. To date, however, most clinical trials have not used this parameter for therapy stratification. Using conventional cytogenetics and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), we investigated 36 tumors in terms of ploidy and chromosome 1 copy number (polysomy). In addition, interphase FISH for polysomy was performed on a second cohort of 440 neuroblastomas, together with the status of 1p, MYCN, and 11q. The main goals were as follows: (1) to assess the reliability of FISH to determine ploidy; (2) to illustrate associations between somy 1 and clinical/biologic factors; and (3) to investigate the role of somy 1 for predicting outcome. The comparison between karyotyping and FISH in the smaller cohort revealed 86% consistency between ploidy and polysomy (31/36). According to FISH, trisomic tumors in the second cohort showed structural chromosomal aberrations less frequently compared to di-/tetrasomic tumors (15 vs. 60%, P < 0.001). The portion of trisomic neuroblastomas was higher in stages 1, 2, and 4S versus stages 3 and 4 (55 vs. 24%, P < 0.001) and in children 18 months or younger versus those older than 18 months (55 vs. 19%, P < 0.001). Prognosis was significantly better for trisomic tumors versus di-/tetrasomic in the whole cohort [event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS), P < 0.001]. In the subgroup without abnormalities of other molecular markers, EFS of trisomic neuroblastomas was better (P = 0.048), but was most likely due to an unequal stage distribution. In further subgroups, in terms of age and stage, significance between the somy groups was not reached, neither for EFS nor OS. The multivariate analyses including age, stage, chromosomal markers, and somy 1 confirmed the lack of independent prognostic power for the copy number of chromosome 1. This study demonstrates the following: (1) FISH is a practical alternative to other more labor-intensive techniques for determining ploidy; (2) trisomic tumors correlate with younger age at diagnosis, localized stage, and the lack of structural alterations; and (3) polysomy is not an independent prognostic marker. The sharp decline of trisomic tumors after the age of 18 months supports the idea of different genetic tumor entities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16682287     DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2005.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet        ISSN: 0165-4608


  10 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of neuroblastoma regression.

Authors:  Garrett M Brodeur; Rochelle Bagatell
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  High-risk neuroblastoma tumors with 11q-deletion display a poor prognostic, chromosome instability phenotype with later onset.

Authors:  Helena Carén; Hanna Kryh; Maria Nethander; Rose-Marie Sjöberg; Catarina Träger; Staffan Nilsson; Jonas Abrahamsson; Per Kogner; Tommy Martinsson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  High genomic instability predicts survival in metastatic high-risk neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Sara Stigliani; Simona Coco; Stefano Moretti; Andrè Oberthuer; Mattias Fischer; Jessica Theissen; Fabio Gallo; Alberto Garavent; Frank Berthold; Stefano Bonassi; Gian Paolo Tonini; Paola Scaruffi
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 4.  The "virgin birth", polyploidy, and the origin of cancer.

Authors:  Jekaterina Erenpreisa; Kristine Salmina; Anda Huna; Thomas R Jackson; Alejandro Vazquez-Martin; Mark S Cragg
Journal:  Oncoscience       Date:  2014-12-17

5.  The role of N-Myc gene amplification in neuroblastoma childhood tumour - single-centre experience.

Authors:  Przemysław Kaczówka; Aleksandra Wieczorek; Małgorzata Czogała; Teofila Książek; Katarzyna Szewczyk; Walentyna Balwierz
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2018-12-31

6.  Identification of lncRNAs Associated With Neuroblastoma in Cross-Sectional Databases: Potential Biomarkers.

Authors:  Bharat Prajapati; Mena Fatma; Mahar Fatima; Md Tipu Khan; Subrata Sinha; Prahlad K Seth
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 5.639

7.  Differential expression of genes mapping to recurrently abnormal chromosomal regions characterize neuroblastic tumours with distinct ploidy status.

Authors:  Cinzia Lavarino; Idoia Garcia; Carlos Mackintosh; Nai-Kong V Cheung; Gema Domenech; José Ríos; Noelia Perez; Eva Rodríguez; Carmen de Torres; William L Gerald; Esperanza Tuset; Sandra Acosta; Helena Beleta; Enrique de Alava; Jaume Mora
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 3.063

8.  Distinct evolutionary mechanisms for genomic imbalances in high-risk and low-risk neuroblastomas.

Authors:  David Gisselsson; Gisela Lundberg; Ingrid Ora; Mattias Höglund
Journal:  J Carcinog       Date:  2007-09-26

9.  Detection of GD2-positive cells in bone marrow samples and survival of patients with localised neuroblastoma.

Authors:  M V Corrias; S Parodi; R Haupt; L Lacitignola; F Negri; A R Sementa; D Dau; F Scuderi; B Carlini; M Bianchi; F Casale; L Faulkner; A Garaventa
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Neuroblastoma after childhood: prognostic relevance of segmental chromosome aberrations, ATRX protein status, and immune cell infiltration.

Authors:  Ana P Berbegall; Eva Villamón; Irene Tadeo; Tommy Martinsson; Adela Cañete; Victoria Castel; Samuel Navarro; Rosa Noguera
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.715

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.