Literature DB >> 16681964

[Surgical resection versus percutaneous thermal ablation for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized clinical trial].

Ming-de Lü1, Ming Kuang, Li-jian Liang, Xiao-yan Xie, Bao-gang Peng, Guang-jian Liu, Dong-ming Li, Jia-ming Lai, Shao-qiang Li.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical results of surgical resection (SR) and percutaneous thermal ablation (PTA) for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (single tumor nodule <or= 5 cm in diameter, or <or= 3 nodules with <or= 3 cm in diameter).
METHODS: One hundred and five patients with 114 HCC nodules were randomly allocated to SR (n = 54) and ultrasound-guided PTA with microwave or radiofrequency energy (n = 51).
RESULTS: The complete tumor elimination rates in SR and PTA groups were similar (100% vs 94.7%) and the local recurrence rates were both 0. There were no significant differences in distance recurrence rate (16.7% vs 27.5%, P = 0.182) and time to the first recurrence (4.9 month vs 9.6 month, P = 0.130) between the SR and PTA groups. One, 2-, and 3-year disease-free survival rates were 82.4%, 82.4% and 82.4%, respectively, in SR group, whereas they were 78.5%, 61.5% and 51.3% in PTA group, respectively. The difference between these two groups was statistically not significant (P = 0.128). The overall survival rates in SR group were 91.3%, 86.4% and 86.4% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively, and those in PTA group were 93.5%, 87.1% and 87.1%, respectively. There was no significant difference between these two groups (P = 0.808). Compared with SR, PTA required less treatment time (27 min vs 145 min, P < 0.005), less necessity for blood transfusion (0 patient vs 7 patients, P = 0.013) and less hospital-stay (5.2 d vs 19.1, P < 0.005). There was no significant difference in the rate of treatment-related complication between the two groups (11.1% for SR vs 7.8% for PTA, P = 0.742). At day 7 and day 30 after treatment, the numbers of patient with physical status (WHO Performance Status grades) of grade 0 - 1 were 32 and 44 in PTA group, respectively, significantly more than 16 and 33 in SR group (P = 0.001 and P = 0.004, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Besides minimal invasiveness, easy to access and cost saving, PTA achieved equivalent local therapeutical effectiveness and 3-year survival outcomes as SR did, and may be considered as a one of the first-choice treatment modality for treatment of early-stage HCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16681964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi        ISSN: 0376-2491


  57 in total

1.  A prognostic model and treatment strategy for intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection.

Authors:  Yuzo Umeda; Hiroaki Matsuda; Hiroshi Sadamori; Hiroyoshi Matsukawa; Takahito Yagi; Toshiyoshi Fujiwara
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation versus partial hepatectomy for multicentric small hepatocellular carcinomas: a nonrandomized comparative study.

Authors:  Wei-Xing Guo; Bo Zhai; Eric C H Lai; Nan Li; Jie Shi; Wan-Yee Lau; Meng-Chao Wu; Shu-Qun Cheng
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Radiofrequency ablation versus resection for liver tumours: an evidence-based approach to retrospective comparative studies.

Authors:  Gianpiero Gravante; John Overton; Roberto Sorge; Neil Bhardwaj; Matthew S Metcalfe; David M Lloyd; Ashley R Dennison
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Percutaneous ablation therapy versus surgical resection in the treatment for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of 21,494 patients.

Authors:  Jia-yan Ni; Lin-feng Xu; Hong-liang Sun; Jing-xing Zhou; Yao-ting Chen; Jiang-hong Luo
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 5.  Hepatocellular carcinoma review: current treatment, and evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  Ali Raza; Gagan K Sood
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Ablation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review of clinical efficacy and prognostic factors.

Authors:  S C Thomasset; A R Dennison; G Garcea
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  The laparoscopic approach for radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma--indication, technique and results.

Authors:  Till Herbold; Roger Wahba; Christopher Bangard; Münevver Demir; Uta Drebber; Dirk L Stippel
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 8.  Advances in managing hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Marielle Reataza; David K Imagawa
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.592

9.  Resection vs thermal ablation of small hepatocellular carcinoma: What's the first choice?

Authors:  Paola Tombesi; Francesca Di Vece; Sergio Sartori
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2013-01-28

10.  Comparative analysis of radiofrequency ablation and resection for resectable colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Sanghwa Ko; Hongjae Jo; Seongpil Yun; Eunyoung Park; Suk Kim; Hyung-Il Seo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.