Literature DB >> 16681731

Human papillomavirus testing improves the accuracy of colposcopy in detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

J Monsonego1, J Pintos, C Semaille, M Beumont, R Dachez, L Zerat, A Bianchi, E Franco.   

Abstract

To assess the performance of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and colposcopy in detection of cervical pathology. A series of 389 women referred for colposcopy due to an abnormal Pap smear had cervical swabs analyzed for oncogenic (high-risk [HR]) HPV types using Hybrid Capture II (HC2) assay. Loop electrical excision procedure cone biopsy (88%) or colposcopic biopsy (11%) was used as the gold standard. Of the atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) smears, 48% were positive for HR HPV, as compared to 76.3% of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) smears. HR HPV was detected in 66.7% and 90% of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1 and CIN2 (or higher), respectively. The sensitivity of the Pap smear using an ASCUS threshold in detecting high-grade CIN was 94.5% (95% confidence intervals (CI): 91-97%) and that of colposcopy 98.5% (95% CI: 95-99%). The respective specificities were 30% (95% CI: 17-28%) and 35.6% (CI: 29-42%). HC2 test had comparable sensitivity, 90% (95% CI: 85-93%), but higher specificity, 54.3% (95% CI: 47-61%). Combining HC2 test with Pap increased specificity, 66.7% and 41.3% for ASCUS and LSIL cutoff, respectively. The minor-abnormality threshold together with HC2 increased specificity of colposcopy with no changes in sensitivity. High viral load (>100 relative light unit/positive control) was associated with significant disease. HPV DNA testing improves the accuracy of colposcopy in the detection of high-grade CIN in women with ASCUS or LSIL smears.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16681731     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00361.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  4 in total

1.  Application of Raman spectroscopy for cervical dysplasia diagnosis.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Kanter; Elizabeth Vargis; Shovan Majumder; Matthew D Keller; Emily Woeste; Gautam G Rao; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.207

2.  Detection and pathological value of papillomavirus DNA and p16INK4A and p53 protein expression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Jingbo Wu; Xiao-Jing Li; Wei Zhu; Xiu-Ping Liu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Triage of women with equivocal or low-grade cervical cytology results: a meta-analysis of the HPV test positivity rate.

Authors:  Marc Arbyn; Pierre Martin-Hirsch; Frank Buntinx; Marc Van Ranst; Evangelos Paraskevaidis; Joakim Dillner
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 5.310

4.  Incisal margin condition after LEEP for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia patients and prognosis.

Authors:  Hong Chen; Xiufeang Liu; Lina Xu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 2.447

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.