Literature DB >> 16680685

Contact stress assessment of conventional and highly crosslinked ultra high molecular weight polyethylene acetabular liners with finite element analysis and pressure sensitive film.

Gordon R Plank1, Daniel M Estok, Orhun K Muratoglu, Daniel O O'Connor, Brian R Burroughs, William H Harris.   

Abstract

Stress magnitude and distribution of both conventional polyethylene versus a crosslinked polyethylene in the liner of a total hip replacement (THR) were examined using finite element analysis and pressure sensitive film. Both types of polyethylene were assessed against head sizes of 22 and 28 mm with 5-mm thick polyethylene liners and head sizes of 28, 38, and 46 mm with 3-mm thick polyethylene liners. Liners with 5-mm conventional polyethylene represented successful combinations with long track records. Our hypothesis was that although the combination of the large head and the lower modulus of the highly crosslinked polyethylene would lead to lower stresses, the stresses would be excessive if the liner was extremely thin at 3 mm. Von Mises stresses at the articulating surface of the highly crosslinked liners were lower, when compared to conventional polyethylene, in every THR size examined. Specifically, however, the 38- and 46-mm inner diameter (ID) highly crosslinked polyethylene even at the extreme of only 3-mm thick had lower stresses than the 22-mm ID conventional liner of 5-mm thickness. These data indicate that the use of a large head against highly crosslinked material even at 3-mm thickness results in lower stresses than in an existing conventional 22-mm head and 5-mm thick combination. Obviously, other considerations will influence the minimum thickness to be recommended. 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 16680685     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  5 in total

1.  High stress conditions do not increase wear of thin highly crosslinked UHMWPE.

Authors:  Natalie H Kelly; Amar D Rajadhyaksha; Timothy M Wright; Suzanne A Maher; Geoffrey H Westrich
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Is the use of thin, highly cross-linked polyethylene liners safe in total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Julio J Jauregui; Qais Naziri; Todd P Pierce; Randa K Elmallah; Jeffrey J Cherian; Ronald E Delanois; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Wear versus thickness and other features of 5-Mrad crosslinked UHMWPE acetabular liners.

Authors:  Fu-Wen Shen; Zhen Lu; Harry A McKellop
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Contact stresses, pressure and area in a fixed-bearing total ankle replacement: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Nicolo Martinelli; Silvia Baretta; Jenny Pagano; Alberto Bianchi; Tomaso Villa; Gloria Casaroli; Fabio Galbusera
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Comparison of conventional polyethylene wear and signs of cup failure in two similar total hip designs.

Authors:  Thomas B Pace; Kevin C Keith; Estefania Alvarez; Rebecca G Snider; Stephanie L Tanner; John D Desjardins
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2013-04-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.