| Literature DB >> 16680178 |
Penny Fitzharris1, Marianne Empson, Rohan Ameratunga, Jan Sinclair, Vincent Crump, Richard Steele, Brian Broom.
Abstract
Anaphylaxis is an important life-threatening medical emergency. There is extensive evidence supporting the early use of intramuscular adrenaline for first medical responders and for self-initiated treatment, in at-risk individuals. Major patient groups identified as at ongoing risk are children and adults with severe food allergy, patients with venom allergy who have not been desensitised, and those with idiopathic anaphylaxis. Individual anaphylactic events are largely unpredictable. The most effective and safe route of administration for adrenaline is intramuscular, but it is difficult for patients and carers to achieve accurate and timely self-administration using an ampoule, needle, and syringe. The adrenaline auto-injector device which is available in New Zealand (the EpiPen) is not funded by PHARMAC, and thus only available to patients and families who are able to afford the purchase cost. It is difficult to understand the continued unwillingness of PHARMAC to fund an adrenaline auto-injector device to at-risk individuals, given the large body of information supporting its efficacy and use. The Australian model, where authorisation from a relevant specialist is required, could be used.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16680178
Source DB: PubMed Journal: N Z Med J ISSN: 0028-8446