Literature DB >> 16679796

Measurement of choroidal melanoma basal diameter by wide-angle digital fundus camera: a comparison with ultrasound measurement.

Jacob Pe'er1, Cristhian Sancho, Jorge Cantu, Sheerlee Eilam, Israel Barzel, Marina Shulman, Eytan Z Blumenthal.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the measurement of the basal diameter of choroidal melanoma, an important parameter for planning treatment and as a prognostic factor, by standardized ophthalmic ultrasound versus that obtained using a wide-angle fundus camera.
METHODS: The longest and shortest basal diameters of 104 consecutive choroidal melanomas of patients seen at the ocular oncology service of the Hadassah University Hospital were measured by B-scan ultrasound and compared with those measured by a wide-angle fundus camera (Panoret-1000). Each diameter was measured thrice by two ophthalmic photographers, and intra-observer and interobserver reproducibility were calculated as well.
RESULTS: The measurements of both the long and short diameters of the choroidal melanomas were significantly larger when measured by Panoret-1000 as compared with the B-scan ultrasound. There was no significant difference among the three measurements of each of the photographers. The interobserver reproducibility between the two photographers was high.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings can be attributed to the larger extent of the pigmentation of the melanoma compared to its recognized elevation. Since pigmentation of choroidal melanoma is easier to recognize than its elevation, we assume that measurement by a wide-angle fundus camera is more accurate in pigmented tumors, and should be adopted for measuring the basal diameter of choroidal melanomas in planning treatment and follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16679796     DOI: 10.1159/000091765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologica        ISSN: 0030-3755            Impact factor:   3.250


  8 in total

Review 1.  A comprehensive review of diagnostic imaging technologies to evaluate the retina and the optic disk.

Authors:  Asima Bajwa; Rabia Aman; Ashvini K Reddy
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 2.  Imaging of retinal and choroidal vascular tumours.

Authors:  H Heimann; F Jmor; B Damato
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Anti-VEGF treatment and peripheral retinal nonperfusion in patients with central retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Kaveh Abri Aghdam; Lukas Reznicek; Mostafa Soltan Sanjari; Annemarie Klingenstein; Marcus Kernt; Florian Seidensticker
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-15

4.  Computing uveal melanoma basal diameters: a comparative analysis of several novel techniques with improved accuracy.

Authors:  Anthony B Daniels; Kevin K Veverka; Shriji N Patel; LuAnne Sculley; Garvin Munn; Jose S Pulido
Journal:  Int J Retina Vitreous       Date:  2019-01-09

5.  Ultra-wide-field imaging of choroidal melanoma before and after proton beam radiation therapy.

Authors:  Angeliki Psomiadi; Gertrud Haas; Michael Edlinger; Nikolaos E Bechrakis; Georgios Blatsios
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 2.597

Review 6.  Can the MOLES acronym and scoring system improve the management of patients with melanocytic choroidal tumours?

Authors:  Bertil E Damato
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.456

7.  Comparison of ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography with the Heidelberg Spectralis(®) noncontact ultra-widefield module versus the Optos(®) Optomap(®).

Authors:  Matthew T Witmer; George Parlitsis; Sarju Patel; Szilárd Kiss
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-02-21

Review 8.  Choroidal melanoma: A short review with an Indian perspective.

Authors:  Bikramjit P Pal; Saili Garge; Vikas Khetan
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017 Sep-Dec
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.