Literature DB >> 16679566

Detecting and imaging protein-protein interactions during G protein-mediated signal transduction in vivo and in situ by using fluorescence-based techniques.

Terence E Hébert1, Céline Galés, R Victor Rebois.   

Abstract

An important goal in cell biology has been to observe dynamic interactions between protein molecules within a living cell as they execute the reactions of a particular biochemical pathway. An important step toward achieving this goal has been the development of noninvasive fluorescence-based detection and imaging techniques for determining whether and when specific biomolecules in a cell become associated with one another. Furthermore, these techniques, which take advantage of phenomena known as bioluminescence- and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (BRET and FRET, respectively) as well as bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC), can provide information about where and when protein-protein interactions occur in the cell. Increasingly BRET, FRET, and BiFC are being used to probe interactions between components involved in G protein- mediated signal transduction. Heptahelical (7TM) receptors, heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide binding proteins (G proteins) and their proximal downstream effectors constitute the core components of these ubiquitous signaling pathways. Signal transduction is initiated by the binding of agonist to heptahelical (7TM) receptors that in turn activate their cognate G proteins. The activated G protein subsequently regulates the activity of specific effectors. 7TM receptors, G proteins, and effectors are all membrane-associated proteins, and for decades two opposing hypotheses have vied for acceptance. The predominant hypothesis has been that these proteins move about independently of one another in membranes and that signal transduction occurs when they encounter each other as the result of random collisions. The contending hypothesis is that signaling is propagated by organized complexes of these proteins. Until recently, the data supporting these hypotheses came from studying signaling proteins in solution, in isolated membranes, or in fixed cells. Although the former hypothesis has been favored, recent studies using BRET and FRET have generally supported the latter hypothesis as being the most likely scenario operating in living cells. In addition to the core components, there are many other proteins involved in G protein signaling, and BRET and FRET studies have been used to investigate their interactions as well. This review describes various BRET, FRET, and BiFC techniques, how they have been or can be applied to the study of G protein signaling, what caveats are involved in interpreting the results, and what has been learned about G protein signaling from the published studies.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16679566     DOI: 10.1385/CBB:45:1:85

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Biochem Biophys        ISSN: 1085-9195            Impact factor:   2.194


  21 in total

1.  Revisiting and questioning functional rescue between dimerized LH receptor mutants.

Authors:  Meilin Zhang; Rongbin Guan; Deborah L Segaloff
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2012-03-08

2.  Förster resonance energy transfer as a tool to study photoreceptor biology.

Authors:  Stephanie C Hovan; Scott Howell; Paul S-H Park
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Resonance energy transfer in cells: a new look at fixation effect and receptor aggregation on cell membrane.

Authors:  Max Anikovsky; Lianne Dale; Stephen Ferguson; Nils Petersen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  BRET3: a red-shifted bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET)-based integrated platform for imaging protein-protein interactions from single live cells and living animals.

Authors:  Abhijit De; Pritha Ray; Andreas Markus Loening; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer studies reveal constitutive dimerization of the human lutropin receptor and a lack of correlation between receptor activation and the propensity for dimerization.

Authors:  Rongbin Guan; Xiuyan Feng; Xueqing Wu; Meilin Zhang; Xuesen Zhang; Terence E Hébert; Deborah L Segaloff
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Subcellular imaging of dynamic protein interactions by bioluminescence resonance energy transfer.

Authors:  Vincent Coulon; Martin Audet; Vincent Homburger; Joël Bockaert; Laurent Fagni; Michel Bouvier; Julie Perroy
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  A modified FCCS procedure applied to Ly49A-MHC class I cis-interaction studies in cell membranes.

Authors:  Johan Strömqvist; Sofia Johansson; Lei Xu; Yu Ohsugi; Katja Andersson; Hideki Muto; Masataka Kinjo; Petter Höglund; Jerker Widengren
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 8.  G Protein-Coupled Receptor Heteromers.

Authors:  Ivone Gomes; Mohammed Akli Ayoub; Wakako Fujita; Werner C Jaeger; Kevin D G Pfleger; Lakshmi A Devi
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 13.820

9.  GABA-B(1) receptors are coupled to the ERK1/2 MAP kinase pathway in the absence of GABA-B(2) subunits.

Authors:  Maxime Richer; Martin David; Louis R Villeneuve; Phan Trieu; Nathalie Ethier; Darlaine Pétrin; Aida M Mamarbachi; Terence E Hébert
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 3.444

10.  Illuminating the life of GPCRs.

Authors:  Ilka Böhme; Annette G Beck-Sickinger
Journal:  Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 5.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.