Literature DB >> 16679475

Patients with poorly controlled diabetes in primary care: healthcare clinicians' beliefs and attitudes.

D Jeavons1, A P S Hungin, C S Cornford.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine doctors' and nurses' attitudes and beliefs about treating patients with type 2 diabetes with less than ideal glycaemic control while receiving maximal oral treatment in primary care.
DESIGN: Focus groups.
SETTING: Primary care. PARTICIPANTS: Four focus groups of 23 GPs and practice nurses.
RESULTS: General practice was thought to be the best setting for managing all patients with type 2 diabetes but there were concerns about a lack of resources and unfamiliarity with starting insulin. Issues around compliance were extensively discussed; the "failing diabetic" had dual meanings of failing glycaemic control and failing compliance and effort by both patient and doctor. Although views about insulin therapy differed, patients were understood to be resistant to starting insulin, representing for them a more serious stage of diabetes, with fears of needles and hypoglycaemia.
CONCLUSION: The role of diabetes specialist nurses working in primary care will be crucial in managing such patients to improve knowledge, for extra resources, for their experience of insulin use, and to change attitudes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16679475      PMCID: PMC2563795          DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.2005.039545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  10 in total

1.  Qualitative research and the problem of judgement: lessons from interviewing fellow professionals.

Authors:  Carolyn A Chew-Graham; Carl R May; Mark S Perry
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.267

2.  Evaluation of a structured treatment and teaching programme on non-insulin-dependent diabetes.

Authors:  P Kronsbein; V Jörgens; I Mühlhauser; V Scholz; A Venhaus; M Berger
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-12-17       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Management of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  G Williams
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-01-08       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Physicians' and patients' views of problems of compliance with diabetes regimens.

Authors:  L Pendleton; W C House; L E Parker
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  The difficult choice of treatment for poorly controlled maturity onset diabetes: tablets or insulin?

Authors:  I Peacock; R B Tattersall
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-06-30

6.  Doctor talk and diabetes: towards an analysis of the clinical construction of chronic illness.

Authors:  R Loewe; J Schwartzman; J Freeman; L Quinn; S Zuckerman
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 7.  Methodological issues in diabetes research. Measuring adherence.

Authors:  S B Johnson
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  The role of physicians' knowledge and attitudes in effective diabetes management.

Authors:  M Weinberger; S J Cohen; S A Mazzuca
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Doctors' beliefs and the management of insulin dependent diabetes: implications for sharing care.

Authors:  A L Kinmonth; T M Marteau
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.267

  10 in total
  17 in total

1.  Clinical inertia in patients with T2DM requiring insulin in family practice.

Authors:  Stewart B Harris; Jovana Kapor; Cynthia N Lank; Andrew R Willan; Tricia Houston
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Effect of Diabetes-Trained Nurse Practitioners on Glycemic Outcomes: Their Suggested Use in Busy Primary Care Practices.

Authors:  Mayer B Davidson
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2021-07

3.  Designing Flexible Longitudinal Regimens: Supporting Clinician Planning for Discontinuation of Psychiatric Drugs.

Authors:  Eunkyung Jo; Myeonghan Ryu; Georgia Kenderova; Samuel So; Bryan Shapiro; Alexandra Papoutsaki; Daniel A Epstein
Journal:  Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst       Date:  2022-04-29

4.  Translating What Works: A New Approach to Improve Diabetes Management.

Authors:  Lawrence S Phillips; Diana Barb; Chun Yong; Anne M Tomolo; Sandra L Jackson; Darin E Olson; Mary K Rhee; Ingrid M Duva; Qing He; Qi Long
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-03-09

5.  Perspectives and experiences of health care professionals and patients regarding treatments for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Bernard Gauthier; Sumeet R Singh; Adil Virani; Heidi Staples; Ann Colbourne
Journal:  Can Pharm J (Ott)       Date:  2014-01

Review 6.  New therapeutic options for treating type-2 diabetes: a review of insulin analogs and premixed insulin analogs.

Authors:  Charles Choe; Steve Edelman
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 7.  Barriers to effective management of type 2 diabetes in primary care: qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  Bruno Rushforth; Carolyn McCrorie; Liz Glidewell; Eleanor Midgley; Robbie Foy
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Insulin Therapy: A Personal Approach.

Authors:  Mayer B Davidson
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2015-07

9.  Impact of baseline insulin regimen on glycemic response to a group medical clinic intervention.

Authors:  Matthew J Crowley; Stephanie D Melnyk; Cynthia J Coffman; Amy S Jeffreys; David Edelman
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Clinical effectiveness of a patient decision aid to improve decision quality and glycaemic control in people with diabetes making treatment choices: a cluster randomised controlled trial (PANDAs) in general practice.

Authors:  Nigel Mathers; Chirk Jenn Ng; Michael Joseph Campbell; Brigitte Colwell; Ian Brown; Alastair Bradley
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.