Literature DB >> 16679196

Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review.

Paola Cozza1, Tiziano Baccetti, Lorenzo Franchi, Laura De Toffol, James A McNamara.   

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review of the literature was to assess the scientific evidence on the efficiency of functional appliances in enhancing mandibular growth in Class II subjects. A literature survey was performed by applying the Medline database (Entrez PubMed). The survey covered the period from January 1966 to January 2005 and used the medical subject headings (MeSH). The following study types that reported data on treatment effects were included: randomized clinical trials (RCTs), and prospective and retrospective longitudinal controlled clinical trials (CCTs) with untreated Class II controls. The search strategy resulted in 704 articles. After selection according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 22 articles qualified for the final analysis. Four RCTs and 18 CCTs were retrieved. The quality standards of these investigations ranged from low (3 studies) to medium/high (6 studies). Two-thirds of the samples in the 22 studies reported a clinically significant supplementary elongation in total mandibular length (a change greater than 2.0 mm in the treated group compared with the untreated group) as a result of overall active treatment with functional appliances. The amount of supplementary mandibular growth appears to be significantly larger if the functional treatment is performed at the pubertal peak in skeletal maturation. None of the 4 RCTs reported a clinically significant change in mandibular length induced by functional appliances; 3 of the 4 RCTs treated subjects at a prepubertal stage of skeletal maturity. The Herbst appliance showed the highest coefficient of efficiency (0.28 mm per month) followed by the Twin-block (0.23 mm per month).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16679196     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  76 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of maxillary protraction using facemask with or without maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Moritz Foersch; Collin Jacobs; Susanne Wriedt; Marlene Hechtner; Heinrich Wehrbein
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  The use of functional appliances in contemporary orthodontic practice.

Authors:  A T DiBiase; M T Cobourne; R T Lee
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Class II treatment by palatal miniscrew-system appliance: A case report.

Authors:  Luca Lombardo; Giulia Occhiuto; Emanuele Paoletto; Bortolo Giuliano Maino; Giuseppe Siciliani
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Skeletal effects in Angle Class II/1 patients treated with the functional regulator type II : Cephalometric and tensor analysis.

Authors:  Simone Schulz; Bernd Koos; Kathrin Duske; Franka Stahl
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Retrospective epidemiological study of mandibular rotational types in patients with orthodontical malocclusion.

Authors:  S Saccomanno; R Deli; G DI Cintio; E DE Corso; G Paludetti; C Grippaudo
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.124

6.  Analysis of clinical efficacy of interceptive treatment of Class II division 2 malocclusion in a pair of twins through the use of two modified removable appliances.

Authors:  R Condò; C Perugia; M Bartolino; R Docimo
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2011-01-13

Review 7.  Treatment effects of fixed functional appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vasileios F Zymperdikas; Vasiliki Koretsi; Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Moschos A Papadopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Class II correction in orthodontic patients utilizing the Mandibular Anterior Repositioning Appliance (MARA).

Authors:  Anil Ardeshna; Frank Bogdan; Shuying Jiang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Three-dimensional treatment outcomes in Class II patients treated with the Herbst appliance: a pilot study.

Authors:  Megan LeCornu; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Hongtu Zhu; Chih-Da Wu; Brent Larson; Tung Nguyen
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Three-dimensional treatment outcomes in Class II patients with different vertical facial patterns treated with the Herbst appliance.

Authors:  Arjun Atresh; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Marilia Yatabe; Luciana Muniz; Tung Nguyen; Brent Larson; David J Manton; Paul M Schneider
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.