Literature DB >> 16679151

Liquid-based versus conventional cervical cytology.

Peter Sasieni, Hilary Fielder, Bryan Rose.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2006        PMID： 16679151     DOI： 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68636-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN： 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


× No keyword cloud information.
  2 in total

1.  Unsatisfactory rate in liquid-based cervical samples as compared to conventional smears: A study from tertiary care hospital.

Authors:  Nalini Gupta; Vikrant S Bhar; Arvind Rajwanshi; Vanita Suri
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 2.091

2.  Uptake of liquid-based cytology as an adjunct to conventional cytology for cervical screening in NSW, Australia: a cross-sectional and population-based cohort analysis.

Authors:  Nayyereh Aminisani; Bruce K Armstrong; Karen Canfell
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.295
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.