Literature DB >> 16679084

Intravascular ultrasonic differences between aorto-ostial and shaft narrowing in saphenous veins used as aortocoronary bypass grafts.

Koichi Sano1, Gary S Mintz, Stéphane G Carlier, Kenichi Fujii, Takenori Yasuda, Masashi Kimura, Jose Ribamar Costa, Ricardo A Costa, Joanna Lui, Giora Weisz, Issam Moussa, George D Dangas, Roxana Mehran, Alexandra J Lansky, Edward M Kreps, Michael Collins, Gregg W Stone, Jeffrey W Moses, Martin B Leon.   

Abstract

Previous studies have reported differences in interventional complication rates that depend on saphenous vein graft (SVG) lesion location. However, little is known about morphologic differences between lesions in different SVG locations. We evaluated preintervention intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images of 75 de novo SVG lesions (aorto-ostial, n = 15; shaft, n = 60) in 63 patients. IVUS data were measured at the minimal lumen area and at 2 proximal and 2 distal references. Positive remodeling was defined as a lesion site SVG area that was larger than the average of the 2 distal references. Shaft lesions more often contained soft plaque (60.0% vs 26.7%, p = 0.02). Minimal lumen areas were identical (4.5 +/- 2.9 vs 4.3 +/- 1.5 mm2, p = 0.3); however, plaque burden at the minimal lumen area was greater in shaft locations (79.3 +/- 9.4% vs 72.1 +/- 9.2%, p = 0.01). The frequency of positive remodeling in shaft versus aorto-ostial lesions was 70.2% versus 26.7% (p = 0.002). SVG shaft lesions have more soft plaque and larger plaque burdens and undergo positive remodeling more frequently than SVG aorto-ostial lesions. These IVUS differences may account for some of the location-specific differences in interventional complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16679084     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.11.080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  3 in total

1.  Virtual histology by intravascular ultrasound study on degenerative aortocoronary saphenous vein grafts.

Authors:  Man-Hong Jim; William Kong-to Hau; Ryan Lap-Yan Ko; Chung-Wah Siu; Hee-Hwa Ho; Kai-Hang Yiu; Chu-Pak Lau; Wing-Hing Chow
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Stent-Only Versus Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty Approach for Saphenous Vein Graft Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From DIVA Trial.

Authors:  Faisal Latif; Lauren Uyeda; Robert Edson; Deepak L Bhatt; Steven Goldman; David R Holmes; Sunil V Rao; Kendrick Shunk; Kul Aggarwal; Barry Uretsky; Islam Bolad; Khaled Ziada; Edward McFalls; Anand Irimpen; Huu Tam Truong; Scott Kinlay; Vasilios Papademetriou; Raghava S Velagaleti; Bavana V Rangan; Kreton Mavromatis; Mei-Chiung Shih; Subhash Banerjee; Emmanouil S Brilakis
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 6.546

Review 3.  Management and Prevention of Saphenous Vein Graft Failure: A Review.

Authors:  Peter McKavanagh; Bobby Yanagawa; George Zawadowski; Asim Cheema
Journal:  Cardiol Ther       Date:  2017-07-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.