Literature DB >> 16678952

Predicting and comparing patient satisfaction in four different modes of health care across a nation.

Annemieke P Bikker, Andrew G H Thompson.   

Abstract

This study aims to inform strategic policy makers and managers about the value of general population surveys by determining and comparing dimensions of satisfaction in four different health services in Scotland: general practice, domiciliary care, outpatients and inpatients (including day cases). The research design involved secondary data analysis of a national telephone survey conducted to inform the development of a national health plan. The database was created using a stratified quota sample of 3052 people of 16 years and above resident in Scotland in 2000. The main outcome measures investigated were overall measures of patient satisfaction with each type of service. Principal components analysis was used to determine the dimensions. Interest was in the extent to which patients, many of whom were the same (having used more than one service), evaluated different services in similar ways, as well as those factors specific to each service. Using logistic regression, the results demonstrate that interpersonal care and information, and desired improvements in service were universal and key explanatory dimensions in all services, followed by a combination of access, physical facilities, time and quality of food, depending on relevance to the service. These factors, particularly interpersonal care and information, distinguished well the highly satisfied from the others, with age providing further discrimination between non-hospital patients, while gender added to discrimination between inpatients. In conclusion, despite the limitations of telephone interviews, it is feasible to ask about several services at the same time and for the answers to reflect common underlying dimensions of evaluation found in more exhaustive research within each service. These factors offer a set of summary measures by which services can be easily evaluated at a strategic level and point to where efforts to increase patient satisfaction can be maximised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16678952     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  7 in total

1.  What does quality care mean to nurses in rural hospitals?

Authors:  Marianne Baernholdt; Bonnie Mowinski Jennings; Elizabeth Merwin; Deirdre Thornlow
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.187

2.  What Can We Do to Improve Patient Satisfactıon in the Emergency Department? A Prospective Study in a Turkish University Hospital.

Authors:  Ozlem Karagun; Hasan Yesilagac; Betul Gulalp; Yuksel Gokel
Journal:  Adv J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-07-15

3.  Patient satisfaction with care for urgent health problems: a survey of family practice patients.

Authors:  Michelle Howard; James Goertzen; Brian Hutchison; Janusz Kaczorowski; Kelly Morris
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Rural-urban disparities in patient satisfaction with oral health care: a provincial survey.

Authors:  Abdalgader Alhozgi; Jocelyne S Feine; Farzeen Tanwir; Richa Shrivastava; Chantal Galarneau; Elham Emami
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  Patients' satisfaction with inpatient services provided in hospitals affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran, during 2011-2013.

Authors:  Jalil Makarem; Bagher Larijani; Kobra Joodaki; Sahar Ghaderi; Fatemeh Nayeri; Masoud Mohammadpoor
Journal:  J Med Ethics Hist Med       Date:  2016-06-11

6.  Is patient-centredness in European hospitals related to existing quality improvement strategies? Analysis of a cross-sectional survey (MARQuIS study).

Authors:  O Groene; M J M H Lombarts; N Klazinga; J Alonso; A Thompson; R Suñol
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2009-02

7.  Satisfaction of inpatients with acute coronary syndrome in Bulgaria.

Authors:  Milka Ganova-Iolovska; Krassimir Kalinov; Max Geraedts
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 3.186

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.