Literature DB >> 16678648

Efficacy and safety of mixed amphetamine salts extended release (Adderall XR) in the management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adolescent patients: a 4-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.

Thomas J Spencer1, Timothy E Wilens, Joseph Biederman, Richard H Weisler, Stephanie C Read, Raymond Pratt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ability to recognize and diagnose attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has increased in recent years. The persistence of ADHD symptoms puts adolescents with ADHD at risk for long-term adverse psychosocial outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: The primary goal of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of mixed amphetamine salts extended release (MAS XR) in the management of adolescents with ADHD.
METHODS: This was a 4-week, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, forced-dose-titration study. Adolescents aged 13 to 17 years with ADHD were randomized to 1 of 4 active treatments (MAS XR 10, 20, 30 or 40 mg/d) or to placebo. All doses were given in the morning. This study used a forced-dose-titration design in which patients randomized to the 10-mg/d group received 1 dose of 10 mg/d for 4 weeks. Patients randomized to the 20-mg/d group received 1 dose of 10 mg/d for the first week and 1 dose of 20 mg/d for the remaining weeks; patients randomized to the 30-mg/d group received 1 dose of 10 mg/d for the first week, 1 dose of 20 mg/d for the second week, and 1 dose of 30 mg/d for the remaining 2 weeks; and patients randomized to the 40-mg/d group received 1 dose of 10 mg/d for the first week, 1 dose of 20 mg/d for the second week, 1 dose of 30 mg/d for the third week, and 1 dose of 40 mg/d for the fourth week. The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline to end point in the ADHD Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) score. The secondary efficacy measure was the score on the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) scale for ADHD. ADHD-RS-IV total scores were analyzed post hoc in patients with low baseline ADHD-RS-IV severity (ie, patients with baseline ADHD-RS-IV total scores less than the median) and high baseline ADHD-RS-IV severity (ie, patients with baseline ADHD-RS-IV total scores greater than the median). Safety was assessed by recording adverse events, vital signs, and body weight at all study visits and 30 days after drug discontinuation.
RESULTS: Of the 287 randomized adolescents, 258 completed the study. The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included 278 patients. The majority of patients were male (65.5%) and white (73.7%) The mean weight (57.8 kg [127.1 lb]) at baseline and the mean height (163.8 cm [64.5 in]) at screening were comparable across all MAS XR treatment groups. Patients in the placebo group had a mean weight of 59.8 kg (131.6 lb) and a mean height of 166.1 cm (65.4 in). Most (56.5%) of the patients had ADHD combined inattentive/hyperactive-impulsive subtype. Two hundred nineteen (78.8%) patients were treatment naive, and 59 (21.2%) had received treatment for ADHD within 30 days before screening. ITT analysis of the ADHD-RS-IV revealed statistically significant (P < 0.001) improvement in mean ADHD-RS-IV total scores in all 4 MAS XR treatment groups, compared with placebo, at all weeks throughout the 4-week study; the mean change from baseline to end point was -17.8 in the MAS XR 10- to 40-mg/d groups and -9.4 in the placebo group. Significant treatment effects were observed in both the ADHD-RS-IV inattentive (P < 0.001) and hyperactive-impulsive (P < 0.001) subscales from baseline. In patients with low baseline ADHD-RS-IV severity, statistically significantly (P < or = 0.01) greater improvements were observed in the MAS XR 20-, 30-, and 40-mg/d groups than in the placebo group; in patients with high baseline ADHD-RS-IV severity, statistically significantly (P < or = 0.02) greater improvements were observed in all active treatment groups compared with placebo. On the CGI-I scale at end point, a higher percentage of adolescents in all MAS XR treatment groups were considered improved (MAS XR 10 mg/d, 51.9% [P < 0.01]; 20 mg/d, 66.0% [P < 0.001]; 30 mg/d, 70.7% [P < 0.001]; 40 mg/d, 63.9% [P < 0.001]) compared with adolescents receiving placebo (26.9%). The most common adverse events in patients receiving MAS XR versus placebo were anorexia/decreased appetite (35.6% vs 1.9%), headache (16.3% vs 22.2%), insomnia (12.0% vs 3.7%), abdominal pain (10.7% vs 1.9%), and weight loss (9.4% vs 0%). Most adverse events were mild or moderate in intensity (97.5%); no serious adverse events were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: The adolescents with ADHD treated with 10- to 40-mg/d MAS XR up to 4 weeks had significant improvements in ADHD symptoms compared with those who received placebo. Results of this study suggest that once-daily dosing with MAS XR up to 40 mg was effective and well tolerated for the management of ADHD in these adolescents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16678648     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  27 in total

1.  The need to develop more sensitive tools to accurately detect clinical response to treatment in ADHD.

Authors:  Rongwang Yang; Shujiong Mao; Rong Li; Zhengyan Zhao
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.749

2.  Age-Dependent Effects of Methylphenidate on the Human Dopaminergic System in Young vs Adult Patients With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Anouk Schrantee; Hyke G H Tamminga; Cheima Bouziane; Marco A Bottelier; Esther E Bron; Henk-Jan M M Mutsaerts; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Inge R Groote; Serge A R B Rombouts; Ramon J L Lindauer; Stefan Klein; Wiro J Niessen; Brent C Opmeer; Frits Boer; Paul J Lucassen; Susan L Andersen; Hilde M Geurts; Liesbeth Reneman
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 21.596

Review 3.  Targeting the nicotinic cholinergic system to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: rationale and progress to date.

Authors:  Alexandra S Potter; Geoffrey Schaubhut; Megan Shipman
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 4.  Pharmacological management of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in adolescents: special considerations.

Authors:  Philip Hazell
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 5.  Pharmacologic treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: efficacy, safety and mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Steven R Pliszka
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 6.  Cardiovascular effects of methylphenidate, amphetamines and atomoxetine in the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Gary Stiefel; Frank M C Besag
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Are attention lapses related to d-amphetamine liking?

Authors:  Michael McCloskey; Abraham A Palmer; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-11-21       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 8.  Issues in the management of patients with complex attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms.

Authors:  Thomas J Spencer
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 9.  Efficacy and safety limitations of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder pharmacotherapy in children and adults.

Authors:  Sharon B Wigal
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.749

10.  Meta-Analysis: Reduced Risk of Anxiety with Psychostimulant Treatment in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Authors:  Catherine G Coughlin; Stephanie C Cohen; Jilian M Mulqueen; Eduardo Ferracioli-Oda; Zachary D Stuckelman; Michael H Bloch
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 2.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.