Literature DB >> 16678452

Responsiveness, effect size, and smallest detectable difference of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in knee osteoarthritis.

D J Hunter1, P G Conaghan, C G Peterfy, D Bloch, A Guermazi, T Woodworth, R Stevens, H K Genant.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the responsiveness, effect size (ES) and smallest detectable difference (SDD) of two Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) measures for osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee: a whole-organ semiquantitative evaluation and cartilage volume.
DESIGN: This analysis was performed on a dataset from a randomized, double-blind trial (Roche NI-15713) conducted in 1998 of a novel therapy in subjects with mild-moderate knee OA, with MRI at baseline and 6-month follow-up. The trial measurements included (1) cartilage volume measured using a proprietary software method; and (2) semiquantitative scoring of other parameters important for "whole organ" evaluation of OA knee joint pathology, using the Whole-Organ MRI Score (WORMS). The analysis initially examined the distributional characteristics of WORMS items, such as cartilage morphology. Standardized response mean (SRM), ES, and SDD between baseline and 6-month follow-up were then calculated in the whole group and the placebo group alone.
RESULTS: In general, the differences were small and this was reflected in the small ESs and SRMs. There was also a suggestion of a treatment effect with reduction in differences between baseline and follow-up in the treatment group.
CONCLUSION: Of the MRI semiquantitative measures, cartilage morphology, synovitis and osteophytes appeared to be responsive to change and the focus of repeat measures should highlight these articular features. In general, the ESs and SRMs were small.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16678452     DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2006.02.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  13 in total

1.  Individual magnetic resonance imaging and radiographic features of knee osteoarthritis in subjects with unilateral knee pain: the health, aging, and body composition study.

Authors:  M K Javaid; A Kiran; A Guermazi; C K Kwoh; S Zaim; L Carbone; T Harris; C E McCulloch; N K Arden; N E Lane; D Felson; M Nevitt
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2012-10

2.  A painful interface between normal aging and disease.

Authors:  Shari Miura Ling; Eleanor M Simonsick; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.053

3.  Evolution of semi-quantitative whole joint assessment of knee OA: MOAKS (MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score).

Authors:  D J Hunter; A Guermazi; G H Lo; A J Grainger; P G Conaghan; R M Boudreau; F W Roemer
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  Non-invasive MRI assessment of the articular cartilage in clinical studies and experimental settings.

Authors:  Yi-Xiang J Wang; James F Griffith; Anil T Ahuja
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-01-28

5.  Worsening Knee Osteoarthritis Features on Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1 to 5 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Brooke E Patterson; Adam G Culvenor; Christian J Barton; Ali Guermazi; Joshua J Stefanik; Hayden G Morris; Timothy S Whitehead; Kay M Crossley
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Change in cartilage morphometry: a sample of the progression cohort of the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  D J Hunter; J Niu; Y Zhang; S Totterman; J Tamez; C Dabrowski; R Davies; M-P Hellio Le Graverand; M Luchi; Y Tymofyeyev; C R Beals
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2008-04-13       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Two year longitudinal change and test-retest-precision of knee cartilage morphology in a pilot study for the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  F Eckstein; M Kunz; M Schutzer; M Hudelmaier; R D Jackson; J Yu; C B Eaton; E Schneider
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  One year change of knee cartilage morphology in the first release of participants from the Osteoarthritis Initiative progression subcohort: association with sex, body mass index, symptoms and radiographic osteoarthritis status.

Authors:  F Eckstein; S Maschek; W Wirth; M Hudelmaier; W Hitzl; B Wyman; M Nevitt; M-P Hellio Le Graverand
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Cartilage lesion score: comparison of a quantitative assessment score with established semiquantitative MR scoring systems.

Authors:  Hamza Alizai; Warapat Virayavanich; Gabby B Joseph; Lorenzo Nardo; Felix Liu; Hans Liebl; Michael C Nevitt; John A Lynch; Charles E McCulloch; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Region of interest analysis: by selecting regions with denuded areas can we detect greater amounts of change?

Authors:  D J Hunter; L Li; Y Q Zhang; S Totterman; J Tamez; C K Kwoh; C B Eaton; M-P Hellio Le Graverand; C R Beals
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 6.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.