PURPOSE: Currently available treatment modalities for high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer have limited chances of achieving complete tumor elimination because of either inadequate local or metastatic tumor eradication. The goal of this phase I/II study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant docetaxel and mitoxantrone before prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 22 men with high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer underwent weekly treatment with docetaxel (35 mg/m(2)), with increasing doses of mitoxantrone (2-5 mg/m(2)) for a 12 of 16-week treatment cycle before prostatectomy. Testosterone and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurements were made before and after chemotherapy. RESULTS: The maximally tolerated dose for mitoxantrone was 4 mg/m(2), and the primary toxicity was neutropenia. Testosterone levels were maintained throughout treatment. PSA reductions were observed in 95% of patients, with a median reduction of 41%. The surgery was well tolerated after chemotherapy, without any major complications. Negative surgical margins were attained in 76% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of multi-agent chemotherapy before prostatectomy was safe in this population. This regimen appeared to have antineoplastic activity as evidenced by PSA reductions in the absence of significant testosterone changes. The benefit of chemotherapy for improving surgical margin rates could not be determined outside of a phase III trial because the effect of patient or surgeon factors could not be dissected from the potential effect of neoadjuvant therapy. Continued study of novel agents in the neoadjuvant setting is warranted because this approach allows for the rapid identification of active agents and for molecular investigation into the mechanism of drug activity.
PURPOSE: Currently available treatment modalities for high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer have limited chances of achieving complete tumor elimination because of either inadequate local or metastatic tumor eradication. The goal of this phase I/II study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant docetaxel and mitoxantrone before prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 22 men with high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer underwent weekly treatment with docetaxel (35 mg/m(2)), with increasing doses of mitoxantrone (2-5 mg/m(2)) for a 12 of 16-week treatment cycle before prostatectomy. Testosterone and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurements were made before and after chemotherapy. RESULTS: The maximally tolerated dose for mitoxantrone was 4 mg/m(2), and the primary toxicity was neutropenia. Testosterone levels were maintained throughout treatment. PSA reductions were observed in 95% of patients, with a median reduction of 41%. The surgery was well tolerated after chemotherapy, without any major complications. Negative surgical margins were attained in 76% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of multi-agent chemotherapy before prostatectomy was safe in this population. This regimen appeared to have antineoplastic activity as evidenced by PSA reductions in the absence of significant testosterone changes. The benefit of chemotherapy for improving surgical margin rates could not be determined outside of a phase III trial because the effect of patient or surgeon factors could not be dissected from the potential effect of neoadjuvant therapy. Continued study of novel agents in the neoadjuvant setting is warranted because this approach allows for the rapid identification of active agents and for molecular investigation into the mechanism of drug activity.
Authors: Hao Geng; Brooks L Rademacher; Janet Pittsenbarger; Chung-Ying Huang; Christopher T Harvey; Marie C Lafortune; Anne Myrthue; Mark Garzotto; Peter S Nelson; Tomasz M Beer; David Z Qian Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2010-04-13 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Catherine O'Brien; Lawrence D True; Celestia S Higano; Brooks L S Rademacher; Mark Garzotto; Tomasz M Beer Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: David Z Qian; Brooks L S Rademacher; Janet Pittsenbarger; Chung-Ying Huang; Anne Myrthue; Celestia S Higano; Mark Garzotto; Peter S Nelson; Tomasz M Beer Journal: Prostate Date: 2010-03-01 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Yu Sun; Judith Campisi; Celestia Higano; Tomasz M Beer; Peggy Porter; Ilsa Coleman; Lawrence True; Peter S Nelson Journal: Nat Med Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Michael Rauchenwald; Maria De Santis; Eleonore Fink; Wolfgang Höltl; Gero Kramer; Isabella-Carolina Marei; Hans-Jörg Neumann; Andreas Reissigl; Nikolaus Schmeller; Walter Stackl; Alfred Hobisch; Michael Krainer Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2008 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: Matthew J Ferris; Yuan Liu; Jingning Ao; Jim Zhong; Mustafa Abugideiri; Theresa W Gillespie; Bradley C Carthon; Mehmet A Bilen; Omer Kucuk; Ashesh B Jani Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2018-10-09 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: B Mellado; A Font; A Alcaraz; L A Aparicio; F J G Veiga; J Areal; E Gallardo; N Hannaoui; J R M Lorenzo; A Sousa; P L Fernandez; P Gascon Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-09-15 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Ryan R Gordon; Mengchu Wu; Chung-Ying Huang; William P Harris; Hong Gee Sim; Jared M Lucas; Ilsa Coleman; Celestia S Higano; Roman Gulati; Lawrence D True; Robert Vessella; Paul H Lange; Mark Garzotto; Tomasz M Beer; Peter S Nelson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-09-08 Impact factor: 3.240