Literature DB >> 1667797

Comparison of neurotransmission with nerve trunk and transmural field stimulation in guinea-pig mesenteric artery.

K D Keef1, O D Hottenstein, A G Meehan, T L Anthony, D L Kreulen.   

Abstract

1. Intracellular electrical and contractile responses to sympathetic nerve trunk stimulation (NTS) and transmural electrical field stimulation (TMS) were compared in the guinea-pig mesenteric artery in vitro. 2. Step increases in voltage with NTS gave rise to excitatory junctional potentials (EJPs) which reached a plateau amplitude of 5-10 mV, whereas with TMS larger amplitude EJPs and sometimes action potentials were obtained. 3. EJPs of equal amplitude (1-7 mV) elicited with TMS and NTS had the same rise time, duration and decay half-time. 4. Slow depolarization obtained with repetitive stimulation was significantly greater in amplitude with TMS than with NTS. 5. Equal amplitude EJPs were obtained throughout the preparation with NTS. With TMS, the amplitude of responses declined substantially with distance from the stimulating electrodes. 6. Tetrodotoxin (TTX) completely blocked EJPs, slow depolarization and contraction with NTS; however, with TMS a TTX-resistant component was observed. The TTX-resistant response to TMS was abolished in the presence of a low-Ca2+ superfusion solution but was not affected by endothelium removal. 7. Phentolamine or prazosin abolished slow depolarization but not EJPs with NTS or TMS. Prazosin abolished contraction with NTS and reduced but did not abolish contraction with TMS. 8. alpha, beta-Methylene ATP abolished EJPs with NTS, whereas with TMS only EJPs obtained with low stimulus intensities were abolished. alpha, beta-Methylene ATP did not block contraction with either NTS or TMS. 9. Combined TTX, prazosin and alpha, beta-methylene ATP abolished EJPs initiated with TMS at all but the highest stimulus intensities (12-20 V, 0.3 ms duration). 10. It is concluded that responses obtained with NTS can be reliably attributed to the release of transmitter by the conduction of action potentials in paravascular nerves, whereas activation by TMS is a more complex phenomenon dependent upon stimulus strength and probably involving multiple forms of activation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1667797      PMCID: PMC1180203          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  25 in total

1.  Some characteristics of the isolated sympathetic nerve-pulmonary artery preparation of the rabbit.

Authors:  J A BEVAN
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1962-08       Impact factor: 4.030

2.  Neurogenic dilator and constrictor responses of pial arteries in vitro. Differences between dogs and sheep.

Authors:  S P Duckles
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 17.367

3.  Activation of mesenteric arteries and veins by preganglionic and postganglionic nerves.

Authors:  D L Kreulen
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1986-12

4.  A simple isolated nerve-blood vessel preparation.

Authors:  I S De la Lande; M J Rand
Journal:  Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci       Date:  1965-10

5.  A comparative study of neuromuscular transmission in several mammalian muscular arteries.

Authors:  A Surprenant
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 3.657

6.  Noradrenaline and adenosine triphosphate as co-transmitters of neurogenic vasoconstriction in rabbit mesenteric artery.

Authors:  I von Kügelgen; K Starke
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Nonadrenergic nature of prazosin-resistant, sympathetic contraction in the dog mesenteric artery.

Authors:  I Muramatsu; S Kigoshi; M Oshita
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 4.030

8.  A study of synaptic transmission in the absence of nerve impulses.

Authors:  B Katz; R Miledi
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  The innervation of sheep mesenteric veins.

Authors:  M E Holman; A McLean
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Contribution by purines to the neurogenic response of the vas deferens of the guinea pig.

Authors:  J S Fedan; G K Hogaboom; J P O'Donnell; J Colby; D P Westfall
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1981-01-05       Impact factor: 4.432

View more
  2 in total

1.  Characterization of non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic inhibitory responses of the isolated guinea-pig trachea: differences between pre- and post-ganglionic nerve stimulation.

Authors:  J D Moffatt; B Dumsday; J R McLean
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 2.  The purinergic neurotransmitter revisited: a single substance or multiple players?

Authors:  Violeta N Mutafova-Yambolieva; Leonie Durnin
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 12.310

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.