OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and the potential complications in the short and medium terms of the transobturator and infracoccygeal hammock, a surgical technique suggested to treat in one sole operating time, by vaginal way, cystocele and stress urinary incontinence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From February 2002 till August 2004, 45 patients aged 66+/-11 years on average, presenting a stage 3 or stage 4 cystocele associated with stress urinary incontinence (proven for 40 of them and masked by the prolapse itself for the other five) benefited from this new surgical procedure. RESULTS: With a mean follow-up of 31+/-9 months, the success rate of the technique is estimated at 98% on the anatomical aspect (one single failure) and at 91% on the urinary aspect (73% of the patients were cured, 18% improved and 9% in failure). No patient presented urinary retention except one with an infected pelvic hematoma requiring its evacuation and the partial ablation of the prosthesis. Postvoid residual volume at discharge was 83 ml. Two patients developed de novo bladder overactivity. Unfortunately we had to regret nearly 18% of exposed prosthesis. This result should be improved by the exclusive use of polypropylene monofilament prosthesis with broad meshes, weak weights and by reduced vaginal scars. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Total treatment by monoprosthesis of cystoceles with associated stress urinary incontinence constitutes an interesting prospect for some high-risk genital urinary prolapses for anatomical repetition or post-operative dysvoiding. Patients with recurrent failures of prolapse surgical cure, those with a large cystocele or by extension with a complete prolapse of the three floors, and even those with a post-hysterectomy prolapse have perhaps found a durable solution with their problem.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and the potential complications in the short and medium terms of the transobturator and infracoccygeal hammock, a surgical technique suggested to treat in one sole operating time, by vaginal way, cystocele and stress urinary incontinence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From February 2002 till August 2004, 45 patients aged 66+/-11 years on average, presenting a stage 3 or stage 4 cystocele associated with stress urinary incontinence (proven for 40 of them and masked by the prolapse itself for the other five) benefited from this new surgical procedure. RESULTS: With a mean follow-up of 31+/-9 months, the success rate of the technique is estimated at 98% on the anatomical aspect (one single failure) and at 91% on the urinary aspect (73% of the patients were cured, 18% improved and 9% in failure). No patient presented urinary retention except one with an infected pelvic hematoma requiring its evacuation and the partial ablation of the prosthesis. Postvoid residual volume at discharge was 83 ml. Two patients developed de novo bladder overactivity. Unfortunately we had to regret nearly 18% of exposed prosthesis. This result should be improved by the exclusive use of polypropylene monofilament prosthesis with broad meshes, weak weights and by reduced vaginal scars. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Total treatment by monoprosthesis of cystoceles with associated stress urinary incontinence constitutes an interesting prospect for some high-risk genital urinary prolapses for anatomical repetition or post-operative dysvoiding. Patients with recurrent failures of prolapse surgical cure, those with a large cystocele or by extension with a complete prolapse of the three floors, and even those with a post-hysterectomy prolapse have perhaps found a durable solution with their problem.