Literature DB >> 16676158

Ant patchiness: a spatially quantitative test in coffee agroecosystems.

Stacy M Philpott1.   

Abstract

Arboreal ants form patchy spatial patterns in tropical agroforest canopies. Such patchy distributions more likely occur in disturbed habitats associated with lower ant diversity and resource availability than in forests. Yet, few studies have quantitatively examined these patchy patterns to statistically test if ants are non-randomly distributed or at what scale. Coffee agroecosystems form a gradient of management intensification along which vegetative complexity and ant diversity decline. Using field studies and a spatially explicit randomization model, I investigated ant patchiness in coffee agroecosystems in Chiapas, Mexico varying in management intensity to examine if: (1) coffee intensification affects occurrence of numerically dominant ants, (2) numerical dominants form statistically distinguishable single-species patches in coffee plants, (3) shade trees play a role in patch location, and (4) patch formation or size varies with management intensity. Coffee intensification correlated with lower occurrence frequency of numerically dominant species generally and of one of four taxa examined. All dominant ant species formed patches but only Azteca instabilis was patchy around shade trees. Ant patchiness did vary somewhat with spatial scale and with strata (within the coffee layer vs around shade trees). Patchiness, however, did not vary with management intensity. These results provide quantitative evidence that numerically dominant ants are patchy within the coffee layer at different scales and that shade tree location, but not coffee management intensity, may play a role in the formation of patchy distributions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16676158     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-006-0123-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  6 in total

1.  Enigmatic biodiversity correlations: ant diversity responds to diverse resources.

Authors:  Inge Armbrecht; Ivette Perfecto; John Vandermeer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-04-09       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Territory defense by the ant Azteca trigona: maintenance of an arboreal ant mosaic.

Authors:  Eldridge S Adams
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Are all ant mosaics caused by competition?

Authors:  Carla R Ribas; José H Schoereder
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Do ant mosaics exist in pristine lowland rain forests?

Authors:  A Floren; K E Linsenmair
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Microclimatic changes and the indirect loss of ant diversity in a tropical agroecosystem.

Authors:  I Perfecto; J Vandermeer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Explaining the abundance of ants in lowland tropical rainforest canopies.

Authors:  Diane W Davidson; Steven C Cook; Roy R Snelling; Tock H Chua
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 47.728

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  How territoriality and host-tree taxa determine the structure of ant mosaics.

Authors:  Alain Dejean; Suzanne Ryder; Barry Bolton; Arthur Compin; Maurice Leponce; Frédéric Azémar; Régis Céréghino; Jérôme Orivel; Bruno Corbara
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2015-05-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.