Literature DB >> 1667560

Current methods of controlling post-operative pain.

R S Sinatra1.   

Abstract

Until recently, the clinical significance of post-surgical pain and its undertreatment were for the most part unappreciated. Recognition that inadequate analgesia adversely affects the patient's cardiovascular, pulmonary, and emotional status has spurred development of new and highly effective methods of controlling pain. With the introduction of spinal opioid and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) came the realization that, while such forms of therapy provided superior pain relief, they were not without their own unique and occasionally serious side effects. For this reason, both techniques are more safely provided by highly trained members of a dedicated acute/post-surgical pain service. Although spinal opioid (epidural, intrathecal) techniques are invasive and require patient cooperation, they have a high degree of safety in low-risk populations (ASA 1 and 2). The major therapeutic advantage of spinal opioids is their ability to prevent pain from being perceived. PCA permits patients to titrate intravenous opioids in proportion to their particular level of pain intensity. Although PCA provides effective pain "relief," the technique is incapable of preventing pain from being appreciated. A number of studies have observed that pain scores in patients successfully employing PCA were significantly higher than those noted in individuals treated with epidural opioids. Nevertheless, the control gained by self-administration, uniformity of analgesia, and low level of adverse results associated with PCA provides higher patient satisfaction and decreased sedation when compared with traditional intramuscular dosing. The effectiveness of PCA may be improved by adjusting for patient variables, utilizing opioids having rapid onset, the addition of a basal infusion, and supplementation with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents. Interpleural analgesia represents an important therapeutic option in patients sensitive to opioid-induced respiratory depression. The technique is more effective when local anesthetic solutions are continually infused. Analgesic efficacy may be further enhanced by the addition of "low-dose" PCA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1667560      PMCID: PMC2589526     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yale J Biol Med        ISSN: 0044-0086


  62 in total

1.  Biphasic depression of ventilatory responses to CO2 following epidural morphine.

Authors:  E R Kafer; J T Brown; D Scott; J W Findlay; R F Butz; E Teeple; J N Ghia
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Differing distributions of receptors for morphine and Met5-enkephalinamide in the dorsal horn of the cat.

Authors:  A W Duggan; S M Johnson; C R Morton
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1981-12-21       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Continuous thoracic epidural fentanyl. A comparison of epidural fentanyl with intramuscular papaveretum for postoperative pain.

Authors:  E A Welchew; J A Thornton
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Dural permeability to narcotics: in vitro determination and application to extradural administration.

Authors:  R A Moore; R E Bullingham; H J McQuay; C W Hand; J B Aspel; M C Allen; D Thomas
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Continuous epidural infusion of morphine for treatment of pain after thoracic surgery: a new technique.

Authors:  N M El-Baz; L P Faber; R J Jensik
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Comparison of intramuscular and epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia in the grossly obese: influence on postoperative ambulation and pulmonary function.

Authors:  N Rawal; U Sjöstrand; E Christoffersson; B Dahlström; A Arvill; H Rydman
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Peridural meperidine in humans: analgesic response, pharmacokinetics, and transmission into CSF.

Authors:  C J Glynn; L E Mather; M J Cousins; J R Graham; P R Wilson
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  A comparison of epidural morphine and epidural bupivacaine for postoperative pain relief.

Authors:  J Modig; L Paalzow
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 2.105

Review 9.  Patient-controlled analgesia.

Authors:  D A Graves; T S Foster; R L Batenhorst; R L Bennett; T J Baumann
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Nonrespiratory side effects of epidural morphine.

Authors:  P R Bromage; E M Camporesi; P A Durant; C H Nielsen
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 5.108

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.