BACKGROUND: Asthma control has been defined clinically by using validated tools, but an asthma control scale using administrative data has not been reported. OBJECTIVE: We sought to validate a beta-agonist asthma control scale derived from administrative data. METHODS: Surveys that included validated asthma symptom and control tools were completed by a random sample of 2250 health maintenance organization members aged 18 to 56 years with persistent asthma. Linked computerized pharmacy data provided beta-agonist canister and oral corticosteroid dispensings. The proposed 4-level asthma control scale was based on the number of short-acting beta-agonist canisters dispensed in 12 months. Construct validity and predictive validity were assessed. RESULTS: For construct validity, factor analysis showed significant loading of the beta-agonist scale on the symptom control factor, and the beta-agonist scale was significantly related to the validated asthma control and symptom scales (r = 0.31, P < .0001). For predictive validity, each progressive level of the proposed beta-agonist control scale was associated with an increased risk of subsequent asthma hospitalizations or emergency department visits and oral corticosteroid use, independent of prior use. CONCLUSION: A scale based on the number of beta-agonists dispensed in a 1-year period and derived from administrative data reflects asthma symptom control over that period of time. This scale can help identify patients who are at risk for future acute asthma health care use. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This information can be used in population management and by clinicians to assess long-term asthma control and identify patients who need intervention to prevent future morbidity.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Asthma control has been defined clinically by using validated tools, but an asthma control scale using administrative data has not been reported. OBJECTIVE: We sought to validate a beta-agonist asthma control scale derived from administrative data. METHODS: Surveys that included validated asthma symptom and control tools were completed by a random sample of 2250 health maintenance organization members aged 18 to 56 years with persistent asthma. Linked computerized pharmacy data provided beta-agonist canister and oral corticosteroid dispensings. The proposed 4-level asthma control scale was based on the number of short-acting beta-agonist canisters dispensed in 12 months. Construct validity and predictive validity were assessed. RESULTS: For construct validity, factor analysis showed significant loading of the beta-agonist scale on the symptom control factor, and the beta-agonist scale was significantly related to the validated asthma control and symptom scales (r = 0.31, P < .0001). For predictive validity, each progressive level of the proposed beta-agonist control scale was associated with an increased risk of subsequent asthma hospitalizations or emergency department visits and oral corticosteroid use, independent of prior use. CONCLUSION: A scale based on the number of beta-agonists dispensed in a 1-year period and derived from administrative data reflects asthma symptom control over that period of time. This scale can help identify patients who are at risk for future acute asthma health care use. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This information can be used in population management and by clinicians to assess long-term asthma control and identify patients who need intervention to prevent future morbidity.
Authors: Doryliz Vila; Cynthia S Rand; Michael D Cabana; Amarilis Quiñones; Mirla Otero; Christina Gamache; Rafael Ramírez; Pedro García; Glorisa Canino Journal: J Asthma Date: 2010-11-01 Impact factor: 2.515
Authors: Matthew A Rank; Ryan Johnson; Megan Branda; Jeph Herrin; Holly van Houten; Michael R Gionfriddo; Nilay D Shah Journal: Chest Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Vincent Lo Re; Dena M Carbonari; Kimberly A Forde; David Goldberg; James D Lewis; Kevin Haynes; Kimberly B F Leidl; Rajender K Reddy; Jason Roy; Daohang Sha; Amy R Marks; Jennifer L Schneider; Brian L Strom; Douglas A Corley Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2015-04-10 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: David S Goldberg; Kimberly A Forde; Dena M Carbonari; James D Lewis; Kimberly B F Leidl; K Rajender Reddy; Kevin Haynes; Jason Roy; Daohang Sha; Amy R Marks; Jennifer L Schneider; Brian L Strom; Douglas A Corley; Vincent Lo Re Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2015-02-28 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Jason Paris; Edward L Peterson; Karen Wells; Manel Pladevall; Esteban G Burchard; Shweta Choudhry; David E Lanfear; L Keoki Williams Journal: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 6.347
Authors: Vincent Lo Re; Dena M Carbonari; James D Lewis; Kimberly A Forde; David S Goldberg; K Rajender Reddy; Kevin Haynes; Jason A Roy; Daohang Sha; Amy R Marks; Jennifer L Schneider; Brian L Strom; Douglas A Corley Journal: Am J Med Date: 2015-11-17 Impact factor: 4.965