Literature DB >> 16673970

Publication of nonsignificant results: a survey of psychologists' opinions.

Stephen Reysen1.   

Abstract

A total of 236 Ph.D. and 1 M.A. faculty completed an e-mail survey regarding their opinions about publication of nonsignificant results. Tenured faculty were significantly less likely than nontenured faculty to write manuscripts for studies with nonsignificant results. Reasons for not writing a manuscript included a perceived inability to publish the manuscript, time concerns, flawed methods or design, inability to interpret results, and the belief that the results are unimportant. The presence of the file drawer problem is supported, and possible solutions are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16673970     DOI: 10.2466/pr0.98.1.169-175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rep        ISSN: 0033-2941


  5 in total

1.  An 8-year longitudinal analysis of UK ophthalmic publication rates.

Authors:  A C O Okonkwo; H D J Hogg; F C Figueiredo
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  Why are medical and health-related studies not being published? A systematic review of reasons given by investigators.

Authors:  Fujian Song; Yoon Loke; Lee Hooper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  White-matter tract abnormalities and antisocial behavior: A systematic review of diffusion tensor imaging studies across development.

Authors:  Rebecca Waller; Hailey L Dotterer; Laura Murray; Andrea M Maxwell; Luke W Hyde
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 4.881

4.  Conditional equivalence testing: An alternative remedy for publication bias.

Authors:  Harlan Campbell; Paul Gustafson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Publication bias in psychology: a diagnosis based on the correlation between effect size and sample size.

Authors:  Anton Kühberger; Astrid Fritz; Thomas Scherndl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.