Literature DB >> 16673355

Trends in paediatric circumcision and its complications in England between 1997 and 2003.

P Cathcart1, M Nuttall, J van der Meulen, M Emberton, S E Kenny.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that too many English boys undergo circumcision. This report describes how circumcision rates have changed in England between 1997 and 2003, including data on complication rates and on how age, medical indication and surgical specialty affect postoperative haemorrhage rates.
METHODS: Data were extracted from the Hospital Episode Statistics database of admissions to National Health Service hospitals in England. Patients were included in the study if an Office of Population Censuses and Surveys version 4 code for circumcision was present in any of the operative procedure fields of the database; 75 868 boys below 15 years of age were included in the study.
RESULTS: Circumcision rates declined by about 20 per cent, from 2.6 per 1000 boys per year in 1997 to 2.1 in 2003. Between 2000 and 2003, circumcision rates remained static at 2.1 per 1000 boys per year. Circumcision rates fell by 31.2 per cent for boys aged 0-4 years, 9.3 per cent for boys aged 5-9 years and increased by 7.7 per cent in boys aged 10-14 years; 90.2 per cent of circumcisions were done for phimosis and 1.2 per cent of boys experienced a complication.
CONCLUSION: Circumcision rates in England continued to fall up until 2000, particularly in those aged under 5 years, in whom pathological phimosis is rare. The circumcision rate remains five times higher than the reported incidence of Phimosis. Copyright 2006 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16673355     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  21 in total

1.  Trends in children's surgery in England.

Authors:  Stuart Tanner
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Trends and attitudes towards paediatric circumcision in the South of Ireland.

Authors:  F O'Kelly; D M Fanning; S Elamin; E Kiely; C M Brady
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Paediatric circumcision using bipolar diathermy.

Authors:  Robert T Peters; Ross Fisher
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  Benign penile skin anomalies in children: a primer for pediatricians.

Authors:  Marco Castagnetti; Mike Leonard; Luis Guerra; Ciro Esposito; Marcello Cimador
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 2.764

5.  Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (full version).

Authors:  Sumit Dave; Kourosh Afshar; Luis H Braga; Peter Anderson
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Penile resurfacing for denuded penis following circumcision.

Authors:  Chandrasen K Sinha; Imran Mushtaq
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 1.827

7.  The advantages of cyanoacrylate wound closure in circumcision.

Authors:  Levent Elemen; Tulay Hosten Seyidov; Melih Tugay
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 8.  Complications of circumcision in male neonates, infants and children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Helen A Weiss; Natasha Larke; Daniel Halperin; Inon Schenker
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 9.  Caudal epidural block versus other methods of postoperative pain relief for circumcision in boys.

Authors:  Allan M Cyna; Philippa Middleton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-10-08

10.  Bleeding complications after ritual circumcision: about six children.

Authors:  Nathalie Bocquet; Hélène Chappuy; Stephen Lortat-Jacob; Gérard Chéron
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 3.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.