Literature DB >> 16673341

The consequences of direct versus indirect species interactions to selection on traits: pollination and nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata.

Rebecca E Irwin1.   

Abstract

Organisms experience a complex suite of species interactions. Although the ecological consequences of direct versus indirect species interactions have received attention, their evolutionary implications are not well understood. I examined selection on floral traits through direct versus indirect pathways of species interactions using the plant Ipomopsis aggregata and its pollinators and nectar robber. Using path analysis and structural equation modeling, I tested competing hypotheses comparing the relative importance of direct (pollinator-mediated) versus indirect (robber-mediated) interactions to trait selection through female plant function in 2 years. The hypothesis that provided the best fit to the observed data included robbing and pollination, suggesting that both interactors are important in driving selection on some traits; however, the direction and intensity of selection through robbing versus pollination varied between years. I then increased my scope of inference by assessing traits and species interactions across more years. I found that the potential for temporal variation in the direction and intensity of selection was pronounced. Taken together, results suggest that assessing the broader context in which organisms evolve, including both direct and indirect interactions and across multiple years, can provide increased mechanistic understanding of the diversity of ways that animals shape floral and plant evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16673341     DOI: 10.1086/499377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  13 in total

1.  Evolutionary indirect effects of biological invasions.

Authors:  Jennifer A Lau
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Interactions between nectar robbers and seed predators mediated by a shared host plant, Ipomopsis aggregata.

Authors:  Alison K Brody; Rebecca E Irwin; Meghan L McCutcheon; Emily C Parsons
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-10-27       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Social transmission of nectar-robbing behaviour in bumble-bees.

Authors:  Ellouise Leadbeater; Lars Chittka
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Additive effects of herbivory, nectar robbing and seed predation on male and female fitness estimates of the host plant Ipomopsis aggregata.

Authors:  Rebecca E Irwin; Alison K Brody
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Attracting pollinators and avoiding herbivores: insects influence plant traits within and across years.

Authors:  Amanda Lynn Buchanan; Nora Underwood
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-03-03       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The mean and variability of a floral trait have opposing effects on fitness traits.

Authors:  Can Dai; Xijian Liang; Jie Ren; Minglin Liao; Jiyang Li; Laura F Galloway
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Functional significance of flower orientation and green marks on tepals in the snowdrop Galanthus nivalis (Linnaeus, 1753).

Authors:  Pavol Prokop; Martina Zvaríková; Zuzana Ježová; Peter Fedor
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2020-08-15

8.  Pollinators of the Rocky Mountain columbine: temporal variation, functional groups and associations with floral traits.

Authors:  Johanne Brunet
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  The genetics of indirect ecological effects-plant parasites and aphid herbivores.

Authors:  Jennifer K Rowntree; Sharon E Zytynska; Laurent Frantz; Ben Hurst; Andrew Johnson; Richard F Preziosi
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  Parasites may help stabilize cooperative relationships.

Authors:  Ainslie E F Little; Cameron R Currie
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.