Literature DB >> 16672872

Radiographic prediction of intraoperative bone loss in knee arthroplasty revision.

Kevin J Mulhall1, Hassan M Ghomrawi, Gerard A Engh, Charles R Clark, Paul Lotke, Khaled J Saleh.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: A key challenge for orthopaedic surgeons performing revision total knee arthroplasty is the management of bone loss. The goal of our study was to test the validity of predicting bone loss from preoperative radiographs using two commonly utilized bone loss assessments: the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute and University of Pennsylvania systems and secondarily to assess the frequency and severity of bone loss in a prospective study of total knee arthroplasty revisions. Ninety-eight total knee arthroplasty revision patients were assessed and bone loss was detected in 76 (77.6%) patients preoperatively and intraoperatively. The validity of both systems was established. Agreement between preoperative and intraoperative Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute classification was fair for the femur and good for the tibia. All University of Pennsylvania preoperative measures were correlated with intraoperative measures. Establishing valid and reliable preoperative systems of measuring bone loss facilitates planning of total knee arthroplasty revision and rehabilitation and meaningful comparisons between different series of patients and treatment protocols. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, level I (prospective testing of previously developed diagnostic criteria on consecutive patients [with universally applied reference "gold" standard]). See Author Guidelines for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16672872     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000214438.57151.a5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  12 in total

1.  Poorer survival after a primary implant during revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Marrigje F Meijer; Inge H F Reininga; Alexander L Boerboom; Martin Stevens; Sjoerd K Bulstra
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Cementless revision TKA with bone grafting of osseous defects restores bone stock with a low revision rate at 4 to 10 years.

Authors:  S A Hanna; W J S Aston; N J de Roeck; A Gough-Palmer; D P Powles
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  No Difference Between Trabecular Metal Cones and Femoral Head Allografts in Revision TKA: Minimum 5-year Followup.

Authors:  Nemandra A Sandiford; Peter Misur; Donald S Garbuz; Nelson V Greidanus; Bassam A Masri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Increasing financial burden of revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kayode O Oduwole; Diarmuid C Molony; Ray J Walls; Simi P Bashir; Kevin J Mulhall
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Bone defect classifications in revision total knee arthroplasty, their reliability and utility: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yasim Khan; Sumit Arora; Abhishek Kashyap; Mohit Kumar Patralekh; Lalit Maini
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-07-03       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Surgical Management of Tibial Bone Loss in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Clinical Outcomes and Radiographic Analysis of Tantalum Cones, Titanium Cones and Titanium Sleeves.

Authors:  Emmanuel Gibon; Terrie Vasilopoulos; Edvinas Sipavicius; Justin T Deen; Hernan A Prieto; Chancellor F Gray; Hari K Parvataneni; Luis Pulido
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2022-06

Review 7.  Bone loss in aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty: management and outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas Bieganowski; Daniel B Buchalter; Vivek Singh; John J Mercuri; Vinay K Aggarwal; Joshua C Rozell; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2022-06-20

8.  Revision of infected total knee arthroplasty: two-stage reimplantation using an antibiotic-impregnated static spacer.

Authors:  Antonio Silvestre; Fernando Almeida; Pablo Renovell; Elena Morante; Raúl López
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2013-08-20

9.  Minimum Two-year Results of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Following Infectious or Non-infectious Causes.

Authors:  Kyoung-Jai Lee; Jae-Young Moon; Eun-Kyoo Song; Hong-An Lim; Jong-Keun Seon
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2012-11-29

10.  Good clinical and radiographic outcome of cementless metal metaphyseal sleeves in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Martin Thorsell; Margareta Hedström; Marius C Wick; Rüdiger J Weiss
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.