Literature DB >> 16672845

Family structure and children's television viewing and physical activity.

Sarah Bagley1, Jo Salmon, David Crawford.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine how physical activity (PA) and television (TV) viewing time of children varied according to family structure.
METHODS: In 2001, 5- to 6-yr-old (N = 296) and 10- to 12-yr-old (N = 919) children and their parents were recruited from 19 state elementary schools in Melbourne, Australia. Children's PA was objectively assessed using accelerometers worn for 8 d. Sociodemographic and family structure information and time spent watching TV was collected via questionnaire completed by parents.
RESULTS: ANCOVA revealed that, after controlling for socioeconomic status and age of child, boys without any siblings spent more minutes per day watching TV (153.2 +/- 71.3) compared with those who have siblings (129.0 +/- 64.4, P < 0.05). There were also significant differences in TV viewing time between boys with one sibling (125.5 +/- 59.9), two siblings (141.9 +/- 70.1), or three or more siblings (111.6 +/- 62.6, P < 0.001). Girls from single-parent families (145.7 +/- 85.1) spent significantly more minutes per day watching TV compared with girls from two-parent families (125.1 +/- 67.7, P < 0.05). Girls with siblings spent more minutes per day in PA (148.3 +/- 67.7) compared with those who were an only child (131.0 +/- 58.9, P < 0.05). There were significant interactions between parental status and having a sibling, with PA, and also with TV viewing for girls and between parental status and having a brother with PA for boys. There were also significant interactions between having an older sibling and child's sex with PA and between number of siblings and sex with TV viewing.
CONCLUSIONS: Family structure may be an important source of influence on children's PA and TV viewing time. Aspects of family structure interact differently with PA and TV viewing, suggesting interventions may need to be tailored with consideration of the family structure of children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16672845     DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000218132.68268.f4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  34 in total

1.  Sociodemographic and home environment predictors of screen viewing among Spanish school children.

Authors:  Itziar Hoyos Cillero; Russell Jago
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.341

2.  The Identification of Family Social Environment Typologies Using Latent Class Analysis: Implications for Future Family-Focused Research.

Authors:  Jiwoo Lee; Martha Y Kubik; Jayne A Fulkerson; Nidhi Kohli; Ann E Garwick
Journal:  J Fam Nurs       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 3.818

3.  Social vulnerability as a predictor of physical activity and screen time in European children.

Authors:  Isabel Iguacel; Juan M Fernández-Alvira; Karin Bammann; Charalambos Chadjigeorgiou; Stefaan De Henauw; Regina Heidinger-Felső; Lauren Lissner; Nathalie Michels; Angie Page; Lucia A Reisch; Paola Russo; Ole Sprengeler; Toomas Veidebaum; Claudia Börnhorst; Luis A Moreno
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.380

4.  Family structure and childhood obesity: an analysis through 8th grade.

Authors:  Alex Y Chen; José J Escarce
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-09

Review 5.  Social vulnerabilities as risk factor of childhood obesity development and their role in prevention programs.

Authors:  Isabel Iguacel; Ángel Gasch-Gallén; Alelí M Ayala-Marín; Pilar De Miguel-Etayo; Luis A Moreno
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 5.095

6.  Do computer use, TV viewing, and the presence of the media in the bedroom predict school-aged children's sleep habits in a longitudinal study?

Authors:  Teija Nuutinen; Carola Ray; Eva Roos
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Family and home correlates of children's physical activity in a multi-ethnic population: the cross-sectional Child Heart and Health Study in England (CHASE).

Authors:  Alison M McMinn; Esther M F van Sluijs; Claire M Nightingale; Simon J Griffin; Derek G Cook; Chris G Owen; Alicja R Rudnicka; Peter H Whincup
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 6.457

8.  Environmental resources moderate the relationship between social support and school sports participation among adolescents: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Dan J Graham; Margaret Schneider; Sally S Dickerson
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 6.457

9.  Family circumstance, sedentary behaviour and physical activity in adolescents living in England: Project STIL.

Authors:  Trish Gorely; Andrew J Atkin; Stuart Jh Biddle; Simon J Marshall
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 6.457

10.  Patterns of adolescent physical activity and dietary behaviours.

Authors:  Natalie Pearson; Andrew J Atkin; Stuart Jh Biddle; Trish Gorely; Charlotte Edwardson
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.