PURPOSE AND METHODS: Leisure physical activity was assessed using questionnaires with different time frames in the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) cohort of 3234 overweight individuals aged > 25 yr with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) from 27 centers across the United States. The three questionnaires were the Modifiable Activity Questionnaire (MAQ; past year), the Low-Level Physical Activity Recall (LOPAR; past 7 d), and the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III; past month). This provided the opportunity to examine the relationship between the three activity measures and to compare activity levels of the DPP sample with that of a national sample with IGT. RESULTS:Leisure activity determined by the three questionnaires significantly correlated with each other, although the correlations between MAQ and NHANES III were stronger (men: rho = 0.52; women: rho = 0.49; P < 0.01) than between LOPAR and either measure (men: rho = 0.20 for MAQ, 0.24 for NHANES; women: rho = 0.10 for MAQ, 0.13 for NHANES). In the DPP, measures of obesity and glucose tolerance were significantly correlated with activity levels determined by MAQ and NHANES, but not LOPAR. Activity levels in DPP participants determined by the NHANES III questionnaire were generally higher than those reported by individuals meeting DPP eligibility criteria who were part of the NHANES cohort for similar age, body mass index, and race or ethnicity. CONCLUSION: If the DPP participants were more active than a national sample of individuals with IGT, this would have implications for translation when using the DPP lifestyle intervention in less active or less motivated populations. Finally, the weak relationship between activity levels obtained with MAQ and LOPAR may result from the fact that they encompass different time frames and different components of leisure activity.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE AND METHODS: Leisure physical activity was assessed using questionnaires with different time frames in the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) cohort of 3234 overweight individuals aged > 25 yr with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) from 27 centers across the United States. The three questionnaires were the Modifiable Activity Questionnaire (MAQ; past year), the Low-Level Physical Activity Recall (LOPAR; past 7 d), and the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III; past month). This provided the opportunity to examine the relationship between the three activity measures and to compare activity levels of the DPP sample with that of a national sample with IGT. RESULTS: Leisure activity determined by the three questionnaires significantly correlated with each other, although the correlations between MAQ and NHANES III were stronger (men: rho = 0.52; women: rho = 0.49; P < 0.01) than between LOPAR and either measure (men: rho = 0.20 for MAQ, 0.24 for NHANES; women: rho = 0.10 for MAQ, 0.13 for NHANES). In the DPP, measures of obesity and glucose tolerance were significantly correlated with activity levels determined by MAQ and NHANES, but not LOPAR. Activity levels in DPPparticipants determined by the NHANES III questionnaire were generally higher than those reported by individuals meeting DPP eligibility criteria who were part of the NHANES cohort for similar age, body mass index, and race or ethnicity. CONCLUSION: If the DPPparticipants were more active than a national sample of individuals with IGT, this would have implications for translation when using the DPP lifestyle intervention in less active or less motivated populations. Finally, the weak relationship between activity levels obtained with MAQ and LOPAR may result from the fact that they encompass different time frames and different components of leisure activity.
Authors: A M Kriska; W C Knowler; R E LaPorte; A L Drash; R R Wing; S N Blair; P H Bennett; L H Kuller Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 1990-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: S N Blair; W L Haskell; P Ho; R S Paffenbarger; K M Vranizan; J W Farquhar; P D Wood Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1985-11 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: J F Sallis; W L Haskell; P D Wood; S P Fortmann; T Rogers; S N Blair; R S Paffenbarger Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1985-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: D J Aaron; A M Kriska; S R Dearwater; R L Anderson; T L Olsen; J A Cauley; R E Laporte Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 1993-07 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: E J Mayer; B W Alderman; J G Regensteiner; J A Marshall; W L Haskell; J Baxter; R F Hamman Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 1991-04 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: J G Regensteiner; E J Mayer; S M Shetterly; R H Eckel; W L Haskell; J A Marshall; J Baxter; R F Hamman Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 1991-11 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: EunSeok Cha; Kevin H Kim; Guillermo Umpierrez; Colleen R Dawkins; Morenike K Bello; Hannah M Lerner; K M Venkat Narayan; Sandra B Dunbar Journal: Diabetes Educ Date: 2014-06-20 Impact factor: 2.140
Authors: Karla A Temple; Ashley H Tjaden; Karen M Atkinson; Elena Barengolts; Tamara S Hannon; Kieren J Mather; Kristina M Utzschneider; Sharon L Edelstein; David A Ehrmann; Babak Mokhlesi Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2019-06-08 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Maureen Sanderson; Gerson Peltz; Adriana Perez; Matthew Johnson; Sally W Vernon; Maria E Fernandez; Mary K Fadden Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Date: 2010-06-29 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Andrea C Betts; Katherine Froehlich-Grobe; Simon Driver; Danielle Carlton; M Kaye Kramer Journal: Disabil Health J Date: 2017-10-27 Impact factor: 2.554
Authors: Bonny Rockette-Wagner; Kristi L Storti; Dana Dabelea; Sharon Edelstein; Hermes Florez; Paul W Franks; Maria G Montez; Jeremy Pomeroy; Andrea M Kriska Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-11-22 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Mary A Hoskin; George A Bray; Kathy Hattaway; Prajakta A Khare-Ranade; Jeremy Pomeroy; Linda N Semler; Valarie A Weinzierl; Judith Wylie-Rosett Journal: Curr Nutr Rep Date: 2014-12-01
Authors: Namratha R Kandula; Swapna Dave; Peter John De Chavez; David X Marquez; Himali Bharucha; Shinu Mammen; Andrea Dunaif; Ronald T Ackermann; Santosh Kumar; Juned Siddique Journal: Transl J Am Coll Sports Med Date: 2016-06-15
Authors: Mark A Newman; Kelley K Pettee; Kristi L Storti; Caroline R Richardson; Lewis H Kuller; Andrea M Kriska Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 5.411