Literature DB >> 16672785

Echocardiographic measurement of fluid responsiveness.

Cyril Charron1, Vincent Caille, François Jardin, Antoine Vieillard-Baron.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Fluid responsiveness is a relatively new concept. It enables the efficacy of volume expansion to be predicted before use, rather than assessed afterwards, thus avoiding inappropriate fluid infusion. Echocardiography is a fantastic noninvasive tool which can directly visualize the heart and assess cardiac function. Its use was long limited by the absence of accurate indices to diagnose hypovolemia and predict the effect of volume expansion. In the last few years, several French teams have used echocardiography to develop new parameters of fluid responsiveness, taking advantage of its ability to monitor cardiac function beat by beat during the respiratory cycle. RECENT
FINDINGS: In mechanically ventilated patients perfectly adapted to the respirator, respiratory variations in superior and inferior vena cava diameters and in left ventricular stroke volume have been validated as parameters of fluid responsiveness. In our opinion, the collapsibility index of the superior vena cava is the most reliable of these parameters, but does require transesophageal echocardiography.
SUMMARY: Echocardiography has been widely demonstrated to predict fluid responsiveness accurately. This is now a complete and noninvasive tool able to accurately determine hemodynamic status in circulatory failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16672785     DOI: 10.1097/01.ccx.0000224870.24324.cc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care        ISSN: 1070-5295            Impact factor:   3.687


  29 in total

Review 1.  Treatment and management of ascites and hepatorenal syndrome: an update.

Authors:  Kurt Lenz; Robert Buder; Lisbeth Kapun; Martin Voglmayr
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.409

2.  Validation of a skills assessment scoring system for transesophageal echocardiographic monitoring of hemodynamics.

Authors:  Cyril Charron; Gwenaël Prat; Vincent Caille; Guillaume Belliard; Montaine Lefèvre; Philippe Aegerter; Jean-Michel Boles; François Jardin; Antoine Vieillard-Baron
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Interactions between respiration and systemic hemodynamics. Part II: practical implications in critical care.

Authors:  François Feihl; Alain F Broccard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  The Diagnosis and Hemodynamic Monitoring of Circulatory Shock: Current and Future Trends.

Authors:  Adham Hendy; Şerban-Ion Bubenek-Turconi
Journal:  J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures)       Date:  2016-08-10

Review 5.  Cardiopulmonary interactions and volume status assessment.

Authors:  Alain F Broccard
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Cardiac function in Vietnamese patients with different dengue severity grades.

Authors:  Sophie Yacoub; Anna Griffiths; Tran Thi Hong Chau; Cameron P Simmons; Bridget Wills; Tran Tinh Hien; Michael Henein; Jeremy Farrar
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Transesophageal Echocardiography, Acute Kidney Injury, and Length of Hospitalization Among Adults Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.

Authors:  Emily J MacKay; Rachel M Werner; Peter W Groeneveld; Nimesh D Desai; Peter P Reese; Jacob T Gutsche; John G Augoustides; Mark D Neuman
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Right and left heart failure in severe H1N1 influenza A infection.

Authors:  S M Brown; J Pittman; R R Miller Iii; K D Horton; B Markewitz; E Hirshberg; J Jones; C K Grissom
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 16.671

Review 9.  Applied physiology at the bedside to drive resuscitation algorithms.

Authors:  Andre L Holder; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 10.  Cardiopulmonary monitoring of shock.

Authors:  James Simmons; Corey E Ventetuolo
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.687

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.