Raja Jaber1, Amy Braksmajer, Jeffrey S Trilling. 1. Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, State University of New York at Stony Brook, NY 11794-8461, USA. rjaber@notes.cc.sunysb.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: The group visit model has emerged as one possible solution to problems posed by the limitations of current structures of care and the demands of a growing chronic illness load. In this article, we summarize current group visit research and develop suggestions for furthering this care model. METHODS: An electronic review of all group visit articles published from the years 1974 to 2004 was conducted via the PubMed and MedLine databases. Reference sections of articles thus obtained were mined for additional citations. Articles were excluded if: (1) they were not research studies (ie, purely descriptive, with no evaluative component); or (2) the group visit intervention was subsumed under larger primary or hospital-based interventions. RESULTS: Although the heterogeneity of the studies presented renders the assessment of this care model problematic, there is sufficient data to support the effectiveness of group visits in improving patient and physician satisfaction, quality of care, quality of life, and in decreasing emergency department and specialist visits. CONCLUSION: Group visits are a promising approach to chronic care management for the motivated patient. Future research may benefit, however, from abandoning old nomenclatures and clearly defining the structure, processes of care, content of visits, and appropriate outcome measures.
PURPOSE: The group visit model has emerged as one possible solution to problems posed by the limitations of current structures of care and the demands of a growing chronic illness load. In this article, we summarize current group visit research and develop suggestions for furthering this care model. METHODS: An electronic review of all group visit articles published from the years 1974 to 2004 was conducted via the PubMed and MedLine databases. Reference sections of articles thus obtained were mined for additional citations. Articles were excluded if: (1) they were not research studies (ie, purely descriptive, with no evaluative component); or (2) the group visit intervention was subsumed under larger primary or hospital-based interventions. RESULTS: Although the heterogeneity of the studies presented renders the assessment of this care model problematic, there is sufficient data to support the effectiveness of group visits in improving patient and physician satisfaction, quality of care, quality of life, and in decreasing emergency department and specialist visits. CONCLUSION: Group visits are a promising approach to chronic care management for the motivated patient. Future research may benefit, however, from abandoning old nomenclatures and clearly defining the structure, processes of care, content of visits, and appropriate outcome measures.
Authors: Hillary D Lum; Rebecca L Sudore; Daniel D Matlock; Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga; Jacqueline Jones; Molly Nowels; Robert S Schwartz; Jean S Kutner; Cari R Levy Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2017 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Melissa R Stein; Irene J Soloway; Karen S Jefferson; Robert J Roose; Julia H Arnsten; Alain H Litwin Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2012-10-02
Authors: Hillary D Lum; Jacqueline Jones; Daniel D Matlock; Russell E Glasgow; Ingrid Lobo; Cari R Levy; Robert S Schwartz; Rebecca L Sudore; Jean S Kutner Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 5.166