Hong-Bin Shen1, Kuo-Chen Chou. 1. Institute of Image Processing and Pattern Recognition, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200030, China. lifesci-sjtu@san.rr.com
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Prediction of protein folding patterns is one level deeper than that of protein structural classes, and hence is much more complicated and difficult. To deal with such a challenging problem, the ensemble classifier was introduced. It was formed by a set of basic classifiers, with each trained in different parameter systems, such as predicted secondary structure, hydrophobicity, van der Waals volume, polarity, polarizability, as well as different dimensions of pseudo-amino acid composition, which were extracted from a training dataset. The operation engine for the constituent individual classifiers was OET-KNN (optimized evidence-theoretic k-nearest neighbors) rule. Their outcomes were combined through a weighted voting to give a final determination for classifying a query protein. The recognition was to find the true fold among the 27 possible patterns. RESULTS: The overall success rate thus obtained was 62% for a testing dataset where most of the proteins have <25% sequence identity with the proteins used in training the classifier. Such a rate is 6-21% higher than the corresponding rates obtained by various existing NN (neural networks) and SVM (support vector machines) approaches, implying that the ensemble classifier is very promising and might become a useful vehicle in protein science, as well as proteomics and bioinformatics. AVAILABILITY: The ensemble classifier, called PFP-Pred, is available as a web-server at http://202.120.37.186/bioinf/fold/PFP-Pred.htm for public usage.
MOTIVATION: Prediction of protein folding patterns is one level deeper than that of protein structural classes, and hence is much more complicated and difficult. To deal with such a challenging problem, the ensemble classifier was introduced. It was formed by a set of basic classifiers, with each trained in different parameter systems, such as predicted secondary structure, hydrophobicity, van der Waals volume, polarity, polarizability, as well as different dimensions of pseudo-amino acid composition, which were extracted from a training dataset. The operation engine for the constituent individual classifiers was OET-KNN (optimized evidence-theoretic k-nearest neighbors) rule. Their outcomes were combined through a weighted voting to give a final determination for classifying a query protein. The recognition was to find the true fold among the 27 possible patterns. RESULTS: The overall success rate thus obtained was 62% for a testing dataset where most of the proteins have <25% sequence identity with the proteins used in training the classifier. Such a rate is 6-21% higher than the corresponding rates obtained by various existing NN (neural networks) and SVM (support vector machines) approaches, implying that the ensemble classifier is very promising and might become a useful vehicle in protein science, as well as proteomics and bioinformatics. AVAILABILITY: The ensemble classifier, called PFP-Pred, is available as a web-server at http://202.120.37.186/bioinf/fold/PFP-Pred.htm for public usage.
Authors: Marylyn D Ritchie; Emily R Holzinger; Ruowang Li; Sarah A Pendergrass; Dokyoon Kim Journal: Nat Rev Genet Date: 2015-01-13 Impact factor: 53.242
Authors: Jeffrey C Grigston; Daniel Osuna; Wolf-Rüdiger Scheible; Chenggang Liu; Mark Stitt; Alan M Jones Journal: FEBS Lett Date: 2008-09-24 Impact factor: 4.124