Literature DB >> 16670975

The confusion effect in predatory neural networks.

Colin R Tosh1, Andrew L Jackson, Graeme D Ruxton.   

Abstract

A simple artificial neural network model of image reconstruction in sensory maps is presented to explain the difficulty predators experience in targeting prey in large groups (the confusion effect). Networks are trained to reconstruct multiple randomly conformed "retinal" images of prey groups in an internal spatial map of their immediate environment. They are then used to simulate prey targeting by predators on groups of specific conformation. Networks trained with the biologically plausible associative reward-penalty method produce a more realistic model of the confusion effect than those trained with the popular but biologically implausible backpropagation method. The associative reward-penalty model makes the novel prediction that the accuracy-group size relationship is U shaped, and this prediction is confirmed by empirical data gathered from interactive computer simulation experiments with humans as "predators." The model further predicts all factors known from previous empirical work (and most factors suspected) to alleviate the confusion effect: increased relative intensity of the target object, heterogeneity of group composition, and isolation of the target. Interestingly, group compaction per se is not predicted to worsen predator confusion. This study indicates that the relatively simple, nonattentional mechanism of information degradation in the sensory mapping process is potentially important in generating the confusion effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16670975     DOI: 10.1086/499413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  7 in total

1.  The key mimetic features of hoverflies through avian eyes.

Authors:  Roderick S Bain; Arash Rashed; Verity J Cowper; Francis S Gilbert; Thomas N Sherratt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Predator confusion is sufficient to evolve swarming behaviour.

Authors:  Randal S Olson; Arend Hintze; Fred C Dyer; David B Knoester; Christoph Adami
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Predation risk as a driving force for phenotypic assortment: a cross-population comparison.

Authors:  D P Croft; S K Darden; G D Ruxton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Individuals from different-looking animal species may group together to confuse shared predators: simulations with artificial neural networks.

Authors:  Colin R Tosh; Andrew L Jackson; Graeme D Ruxton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  A Sensory-Driven Trade-Off between Coordinated Motion in Social Prey and a Predator's Visual Confusion.

Authors:  Bertrand H Lemasson; Colby J Tanner; Eric Dimperio
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Camouflaging moving objects: crypsis and masquerade.

Authors:  Joanna R Hall; Roland Baddeley; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; Adam J Shohet; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 2.671

7.  Motion dazzle and the effects of target patterning on capture success.

Authors:  Anna E Hughes; Jolyon Troscianko; Martin Stevens
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 3.260

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.