Literature DB >> 16670863

Breast imaging. Preoperative breast cancer staging: comparison of USPIO-enhanced MR imaging and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDC) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for axillary lymph node staging--initial findings.

Tadeusz W Stadnik1, Hendrik Everaert, Smitha Makkat, Robert Sacré, Jan Lamote, Claire Bourgain.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging after ultra-small super paramagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) injection and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for preoperative axillary lymph node staging in patients with breast cancer were evaluated using histopathologic findings as the reference standard. USPIO-enhanced MR and FDG-PET were performed in ten patients with breast cancer who were scheduled for surgery and axillary node resection. T2-weighted fast spin echo, T1-weighted three-dimensional (3D) gradient echo, T2*-weighted gradient echo and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted 3D gradient echo with spectral fat saturation were evaluated. MR imaging before USPIO infusion was not performed. The results were correlated with FDG-PET (acquired with dedicated PET camera, visual analysis) and histological findings. The histopathologic axillary staging was negative for nodal malignancy in five patients and positive in the remaining five patients. There was one false positive finding for USPIO-enhanced MR and one false negative finding for FDG-PET. A sensitivity (true positive rate) of 100%, specificity (true negative rate) of 80%, positive predictive value of 80%, and negative predictive value of 100% were achieved for USPIO-enhanced MR and of 80%, 100%, 100%, 80% for FDG-PET, respectively. The most useful sequences in the detection of invaded lymph nodes were in the decreasing order: gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted 3D gradient echo with fat saturation, T2*-weighted 2D gradient echo, T1-weighted 3D gradient echo and T2-weighted 2D spin echo. In our study, USPIO-enhanced T1 gradient echo after gadolinium injection and fat saturation emerged as a very useful sequence in the staging of lymph nodes. The combination of USPIO-enhanced MR and FDG-PET achieved 100% sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV. If these results are confirmed, the combination of USPIO MR with FDG-PET has the potential to identify the patient candidates for axillary dissection versus sentinel node lymphadenectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16670863     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0276-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  26 in total

1.  Preoperative breast cancer staging: MR imaging of the axilla with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide enhancement.

Authors:  Sven C A Michel; Thomas M Keller; Johannes M Fröhlich; Daniel Fink; Rosmarie Caduff; Burkhardt Seifert; Borut Marincek; Rahel A Kubik-Huch
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  MR imaging-guided axillary node biopsy for breast cancer: initial findings.

Authors:  Takuji Yamagami; Sachiko Yuen; Kiyoshi Sawai; Tsunehiko Nishimura
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-06-14       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  MR imaging of mediastinal lymph nodes: evaluation using a superparamagnetic contrast agent.

Authors:  H K Pannu; K P Wang; T L Borman; D A Bluemke
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Multicenter clinical trial of ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide in the evaluation of mediastinal lymph nodes in patients with primary lung carcinoma.

Authors:  B C Nguyen; W Stanford; B H Thompson; N P Rossi; K H Kernstine; J A Kern; R A Robinson; J K Amorosa; J F Mammone; E K Outwater
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  Lymph nodes of the neck.

Authors:  P M Som
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  CT of cervical lymph node cancer.

Authors:  A A Mancuso; D Maceri; D Rice; W Hanafee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Gray scale and power Doppler US in the preoperative evaluation of axillary metastases in breast cancer patients with no palpable lymph nodes.

Authors:  Gul Esen; Bengi Gurses; Mehmet Halit Yilmaz; Sennur Ilvan; Sila Ulus; Varol Celik; Mehmet Farahmand; Ozden Oz Calay
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-02-03       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison.

Authors:  Gina Brown; Catherine J Richards; Michael W Bourne; Robert G Newcombe; Andrew G Radcliffe; Nicholas S Dallimore; Geraint T Williams
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Rectal cancer: mesorectal lymph nodes at MR imaging with USPIO versus histopathologic findings--initial observations.

Authors:  Dow-Mu Koh; Gina Brown; Louis Temple; Asraf Raja; Paul Toomey; Nicholas Bett; Andrew R Norman; Janet E Husband
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-02-19       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  A prospective evaluation of positron emission tomography scanning, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and standard axillary dissection for axillary staging in patients with early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Peter J Lovrics; Vicky Chen; Geoff Coates; Sylvie D Cornacchi; Charlie H Goldsmith; Calvin Law; Mark N Levine; Ken Sanders; Ved R Tandan
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-08-16       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  12 in total

1.  [Non-invasive imaging modalities for preoperative axillary lymph node staging in patients with breast cancer].

Authors:  K Wasser; A Schnitzer; J Brade; S O Schoenberg
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  Is imaging the future of axillary staging in breast cancer?

Authors:  M Ahmed; S I Usiskin; M A Hall-Craggs; Michael Douek
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Cost modeling of preoperative axillary ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration to guide surgery for invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Judy C Boughey; James P Moriarty; Amy C Degnim; Melissa S Gregg; Jason S Egginton; Kirsten Hall Long
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of lymph nodes in cancer patients.

Authors:  Seung Hong Choi; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 5.  A systematic review of FDG-PET in breast cancer.

Authors:  S Escalona; J A Blasco; M M Reza; E Andradas; N Gómez
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Use of ultrasound-guided axillary node core biopsy in staging of early breast cancer.

Authors:  P D Britton; A Goud; S Godward; S Barter; A Freeman; M Gaskarth; P Rajan; R Sinnatamby; J Slattery; E Provenzano; M O'Donovan; S Pinder; J R Benson; P Forouhi; G C Wishart
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Targeted nanoparticles in imaging: paving the way for personalized medicine in the battle against cancer.

Authors:  Soo J Shin; Jaymes R Beech; Kimberly A Kelly
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 8.  Imaging and cancer: a review.

Authors:  Leonard Fass
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 7.449

9.  Accuracy of computed tomography perfusion in assessing metastatic involvement of enlarged axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Yun Liu; Massimo Bellomi; Giovanna Gatti; Xuejun Ping
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 10.  The role of magnetic nanoparticles in the localization and treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  M Ahmed; M Douek
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.