Literature DB >> 16670753

Defending science education against intelligent design: a call to action.

Alan D Attie1, Elliot Sober, Ronald L Numbers, Richard M Amasino, Beth Cox, Terese Berceau, Thomas Powell, Michael M Cox.   

Abstract

We review here the current political landscape and our own efforts to address the attempts to undermine science education in Wisconsin. To mount an effective response, expertise in evolutionary biology and in the history of the public controversy is useful but not essential. However, entering the fray requires a minimal tool kit of information. Here, we summarize some of the scientific and legal history of this issue and list a series of actions that scientists can take to help facilitate good science education and an improved atmosphere for the scientific enterprise nationally. Finally, we provide some model legislation that has been introduced in Wisconsin to strengthen the teaching of science.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16670753      PMCID: PMC1451210          DOI: 10.1172/JCI28449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Invest        ISSN: 0021-9738            Impact factor:   14.808


  2 in total

1.  Tetrapod-like middle ear architecture in a Devonian fish.

Authors:  Martin D Brazeau; Per E Ahlberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Medicine needs evolution.

Authors:  Randolph M Nesse; Stephen C Stearns; Gilbert S Omenn
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-02-24       Impact factor: 47.728

  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  Why we think it is important to discuss intelligent design.

Authors:  Ushma S Neill; Andrew R Marks
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 14.808

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.